low elo needs 10 bans.

DiveAlive·2/16/2020, 4:42:41 PM·4 votes·2,122 views

It just does.

iron-plat

14 Comments

MrFawknSunshine2/16/2020, 5:16:54 PM3 votes

it really dont. low elo needs to become better

Hotarµ2/16/2020, 5:28:51 PM1 votes

Instead of just banning everything, players need to learn how to play against certain champions.

That's why champions like Tryndamere, Nasus, and Garen thrive at lower levels of play. People don't take any proactive steps to beat them, they don't build defensively, and they don't make any effort to learn things like how to kite/freeze/trade.

Banning is not a substitute for lack of knowledge.

Saezio2/16/2020, 5:37:53 PM1 votes

Low elo already has 10 bans. One for each player...

Cycera2/16/2020, 5:44:34 PM1 votes

I feel like every elo should have more bans. When were bans rolled out? There were far less champions then. Oh boy we get to ban 7% of the champions. Surely that covers all bases.

If not more bans, we shouldn't be able to waste bans. Why ban no one? Why does each team get to ban the same champs? We should all be able to see the bans while they're happening so there are no wasted ones. If someone has no one to ban, the team should be able to vote on a ban or something.

NickColaTesla 2/16/2020, 10:35:56 PM1 votes

All elos need 10 bans each team.

5 years from now there's going to be 200+ champions and we only get 5 bans each. Really now.

Smiling Frog2/17/2020, 5:48:50 PM1 votes

they dont