Do you think league is fairly balanced?
Its a question I have had sense I started playing. so I don't corrupt the poll itself I won't give my opinion.
14 Comments
Back in the early day of league I had the feeling that riot games at least tried to make all the champions equally good. It's something that can never be achieved in this game, because when balancing the game you have to do a lot of compromises. Like Azir that completly breaks the game in proplay while being one of the worst midlaners for soloqueue. Or champions like annie that perform extremly differently in high-elo or low elo.
But nowadays I feel like riot is intentionally picking out their favourites. Oh akali gets 4 skins in one year, and also "happens to be" the overall best champion for pretty much the whole season 9. And maybe the people who watch worlds want to see some lee sin outplays, or blitzcrank-invades. And every new champion has to be top-tier pick of the meta for 3-5 months or so.
I think they are doing the best they can and find it funny people bitch about but probably couldn't do any better
mostly balanced, the only time it isn't is when new things get added or old things get buffed. but those simmer down in 2 weeks anyway so i would ask the boards to spare me the tears.
I mean every role has at least 2 unbalanced champs. Top: Morde, Aphelios Jungle: Aphelios Mid: Aphelios Adc: Aphelios Sup :Aphelios
For such badly designed game yes, it is mostly balanced.
I mean it's a moba so things will always be better then others. So yeah mostly balanced.
Like mordekaiser is better then many other tops BUT it's not a insta lose.
if the game was balanced, there wouldn't be a meta. Mind blown amirite?