So what champs are BAD
so. I have seen Mordekaiser,Galio and Malzahar. though I remember seeing urgot at some point. why is
bad? his moveset looks great!
so. I have seen Mordekaiser,Galio and Malzahar. though I remember seeing urgot at some point. why is
bad? his moveset looks great!
Urgot really isn't bad. It just depends on his opponents and how the he is played. I have seen Urgot players carry games because of the mid game penetration they offer as long as they don't get stomped.
I don't play Urgot, but I have played him a few times in the past (a long time ago) and I think he has a great moveset and is a good champion. All depends on how people play him and how well he does during the game. If he does great he can penetrate and stomp, if he get's bullied he will be crappy until he hits a hopeful late game build set.
The reason people consider Ugot bad is more than his moveset.
Hes supposed to be of Noxian decent, but looks like he's from Zaun. He's huge and bulky, resembling a tanky champion; but he is a ranged damage dealer. He is ranged dps, yet his ult intentionally puts him in melee range of a fight (not where a RDPS wants to be). Also, he is very scary-looking and not something youd want in your face: thanks to his kit, he'll never be in your face (lame, right?).
Urgot ( i think ) isn't a bad champion, but these are all reasons why he isn't very popular. Also people consider him rather boring since his Q homes in once you land the grenade.
Urgot isn't bad. Nunu is bad. Teemo is bad. Urgot is a decent top.
dong haup says
is sleeper op. And although people say the rework is a fail, I think malz supp is ok.
Urgot has a great moveset. Using the skills on the other hand is a whole different story.

In my opinion these guys are some of the worst champions that definitely need a modernization.
Tf? Seriously?