Hard vs Easy Champions
I've heard pieces of this argument throughout other posts so I thought I'd make a proper post out of it.
The argument for easy champions:
I've been told and seen other people say this quite a few times "Learn simple champions, you'll thank me later". As if playing hard champions was a weakness. Playing an easy champion is seen by some as an advantage because it allows you to focus on your macro play, and have better map awareness. You can spend more time learning the game, not a champion.
The argument for hard champions:
I'm sure your all familiar with this "Play a hard carry champion, its the best way to improve". In direct contradiction to what
mains would have you believe these summoners believe if you're not carrying you're not improving. The pro's of complex champions like
are in her ability to "outplay" almost any scenario. I've never hear a Yasuo main say "Yeah, there is nothing I can do here" and just give up. But while it may no bother most, you still have to live with the notoriety of your champion, because every summoner has had their fair share of salty tryhard players.
Please discuss your oppinion below, I'd love to hear what you guys think about this topic.
Soft:

