I don't like the idea of letting the next champ copy other champs ultimates, I mean pretty sure we all remember the outcry about Zoe being able to mimic activatables on items and summs, do we really need this too?
The Ecdysiast3 votesThe problems with Zoe are quite different though. If it were an ultimate ability on a fairly long cooldown, it'd be more reasonable. And active items/spells are abilities that benefit her regardless because they're pretty much always suitable. It's not like it's ever bad to have flash up, and everyone brings flash.
But for Sylas, it's not like you can always take an ultimate that'll be good for the situation, or take it anywhere near as often.
(And saying, "unpopular opinion but," means absolutely nothing when you can see on the boards other threads about it and know for a fact you're at least not in the minority of the boards users)
Illabethe1 votesThe Zoe outcry over her W is misguided and lacking of game knowledge. You need to realize...... they could release a 5-10% win rate champ with 1 damage on each skill with a 10% ratio on abilities, and the community would cry "broken" right now.
What's REALLY happened: Players right now feel pampered, and don't like to attempt to learn to play against an ever growing pool of champions. Most of the people who are complaining were "Done" at 128 champions. Now we have 150+ and they can't learn to counterplay quick enough to adapt to different opponents every game"
Even in her first incarnation, Zoe wasn't actually broken. She received nerfs at a 35% win rate. She was outright outplayed on day 1 by her common counters. Even pros struggled to wrack up good KDAs on her. "1 Hit Montages" consisted of 30-40 games worth of samples just to find 10 1 shots, and almost all of them were post 40 minutes. In her first incarnation, I could recieve Zoe's full kit on a Nami and survive to duel her. Now she's just a joke, if you play right around her. It's not like her ult is an escape button.
