This is what I mean when I say matchmaking is idiotic and unfair

ExpStealer·2/3/2019, 8:23:32 PM·3 votes·2,206 views
https://i.ibb.co/x6YkHXk/screen.png

You see, I did win this game by solocarrying (almost). It was a one-sided stomp from the worst kind. Why?

Because the enemy support - Pyke - quite literally had no idea how to play his champion. It was so bad that as long as their teammates didn't gank (which they didn't cause they simply gave me even more kills instead) I could win the lane 1v2, which is an all-time low even for Iron IV, let alone Silver III. The only other person I could judge was Nasus. He did pretty good and beat our toplaner - Cho'Gath. When I first tried to 1v1 him he killed me due to having almost 500 stacks on his Q already, which translated into half my Health bar worth of damage with just one of them. He maybe could've turned around the game if he didn't decide to AFK in base because "they don't deserve to win".

So basically the game got decided by that one feeder Pyke, who shouldn't be matched against anyone on our team (or his). And then people have the audacity to say ELO Hell doesn't exist and that your team can't hold you back. Better think again. Riot's matchmaking right now is luck of the dice - whether you'll get good teammates or the monkeys. Which is unfair and has to change. And my main question is why, on Earth, is anyone matched with Bronze, Gold or unranked players, if they're Silver? Unless you're in promos for Gold IV I don't see a legit reason.

Nasus, btw, is Bronze III, which is an entire league below me, while Pyke, who can't even play, is Bronze I. Excuse me, what the fuck? If you think it's just Pyke, no. He's doing bad on every single champion. It's almost as if he bought his account.

0 Comments