I don't understand why you're correcting me...
I'd rather see his overall range nerfed. Thematically, graves a ranged bruiser (As opposed to Riot's claim as a near melee marksman). He 's supposed to be getting close and shot-gunning people in the face. To survive at that range, he needs some level of durability.
and then
I'd rather see them reinforce the face-blasting concept, then remove the durability and force graves away from the front line.
So... if we're using "then," which you said "AFTER X," then we have...
I'd rather see them reinforce the face-blasting concept, and AFTER THAT remove the durability and force graves away from the front line.
Er... that doesn't make sense give the first quote.
but
I'd rather see them reinforce the face-blasting concept COMPARED TO remov[ing] the durability and force graves away from the front line.
Now, after ranting at me and making me think I was wrong until I reread the post I was answering with, it turns out I was correct and people just upvoted you on some bandwagon.
So, er, you kind of messed up here. I think you owe me an apology... unless nerfing an ADC's front range and needing some durability is solved by removing durability and forcing the ADC away from the front line.
Kind of irks me that upon closer examination your rant gets so many upvotes... when, well, my thought process wasn't so flawed after all :/ You probably won't respond, though, but even I do that sometimes... Hopefully you won't be like that one guy and completely ignore me, and pretend I said one thing no matter how many times I quote myself and use multiple alt accounts to upvote yourself. I've seen that shit happen, it's kind of stupid.
However, to be a cheeky bastard
HOW DO PEOPLE STILL MESS THIS UP
Now you know why. People make mistakes, including you.
\rant reversal