Boards›Gameplay

worst idea decreasing exp to lv.30

Ailady·9/14/2016, 10:14:15 AM·2 votes·487 views

i feel sorry for the new lv.30s that have 50 wins and no experience go up against the lv.30s with 500-1500 wins, they need to be up against lv.20-25... its pretty harsh matching them up against superior people.. they can't learn anything when they are getting obliterated like cm punk ufc fight.

this was the stupidest update ever, the players honestly had no problem reaching lv.30 all riot did was make it alot easier for the good players to create alts to farm ranked and sell the accounts to retards without any experience for money. (maybe riot got bribed to implent this?)

ps. it's sad that there are people that would buy their way to higher elos or even a account in high elo just to show off lol

4 Comments

GreenLore9/14/2016, 10:20:38 AM2 votes

Its not like riots system thinks "lv30=lv30" Players with level 30 that have only played the minimum amount of games to reach that level will usually be placed against players who have played a similar amount of games.

The big advantage of getting to level 30 early is that it helps negating your early game disadvantage. So that if you are level 20 and are placed against someone level 30 you aren't at a statistical disadvantage anymore(after all you can only have a limited number of runes and masteries at the earlier levels)

OneMustFall9/14/2016, 10:37:34 AM2 votes

It took fucking forever before reach level 30. You needed an insane amount of games that could take months of playing daily to acquire. For Ranked to have that kind of barrier was crazy and all it led to was people spamming AI games and botting, not learning the game.