Whats the worst? Shit matchmaking, smurfs or ARAM accounts?

ForFoxSakes·10/31/2018, 5:31:01 AM·1 votes·1,377 views

Shit matchmaking - rampant in 3v3 TT, flex and norms. Only solo queue is "somewhat decent" but most of the time have a range of 1 division+. Meanwhile flex WILL have shit like diamonds, plat and bronze all in the same game. Roulette of which you get

Smurfs - Actually take skill to win a game, but shouldn't be at the ELO. Can be on your team for a free win, or enemy team for a free loss. IMO the least of the problems since they arent as abundant as people actually claim. Just because someone gets fed or stomps you doesnt mean they're a smurf

ARAM accounts - ruins the entire point of ARAM being random, then likely the ones who flame you the most when they have a stacked team vs your actual random less optimal team comp. These guys are like the "smurfs" but have no real skill who resort to ARAM because theyre usually really bad at the game but stack the team comp and champs in order to get the advantage

4 Comments

Jeddite10/31/2018, 5:45:37 AM1 votes

Where's the option for useless poll threads from virg-spergs?

Rewt10/31/2018, 5:50:49 AM1 votes

I honestly have no issue with ARAM accounts. If you only like ARAM and build your account around it thats your choice. Just As most of my champs I own are for jungling

Taric the Gay10/31/2018, 8:59:52 AM1 votes

Lux mains are the worst. Definitely Lux mains.

http://www.auplod.com/u/pdolua802d6.png