I'm sorry Riot, but there's no excuse for not giving each player on each team a single ban. This way, everyone has a chance to get rid of something they don't want to deal with and then maybe, especially as a top lane main, I'll get to see more than four champions being played.
Alutrosity2 votesBecause limiting the amount of bans a team has is supposed to encourage them to put more thought into which champion they remove from the match. We also live in an age where the meta includes a whole class of champions, and ban habits tend to revolve around those classes, therefore we could wind up in a situation where far too many mages could get banned in a single match, marksman, tank, etc which might end up forcing someone to play a champion they are not particularly good at.
StickyOctopi1 votesWell with 10 bans you could effectively ban out the entire meta. You could ban the 2 best champs for every role, so basically 10 champs would be permabanned then the game would be entirely played with 2nd tier champs.
Nocturnes1 votesWell with 10 bans you could effectively ban out the entire meta. You could ban the 2 best champs for every role, so basically 10 champs would be permabanned then the game would be entirely played with 2nd tier champs.
It's almost as if it would encourage more variety with respect to what champions are picked...
Kal Vas Flam1 votesYeah don't wanna spend an hour waiting to get into a game. kthx no