Surrender, and Early Surrender: Needs Improvement

League has pressed for "a shorter game." So. . . :

"Surrender" at 15.

"Early Surrender" at 10.

[slayer-jinx-wink]

I'm glad for the one person, who wants to keep struggling. I agree with their top laner: our team is good enough to "come back."

. . . .however, my team's top laner fed 1-5, then disconnected from the game at minute 12. The enemy team took herald, and has destroyed an inhibitor. I agree with their top laner: my team can stall out the game against their team, but this dc isn't coming back.

[zombie-nunu-tears]

I want to surrender, and go into queue for a new match. 3 players on my team agree.

[sg-syndra]

"Must be unanimous."

Three, of the four players, said: "we don't want to continue this game: let's start a new match." A player went 1-5, and dc'd.

"Must be unanimous."

[sg-syndra] [sg-syndra] [sg-syndra]

Two more players, disconnected.

Sometimes, it's good training to struggle in a difficult game; lose, and train. I didn't want to. Three, of the four players, agree.

You know, DOTA 2, lets you control a DC'd player. We probably could have won, with that technology. Their top laner was correct: our team of four, was more skilled than their team of five. But, we don't have that technology here: we can only use the strength of four here, and not "the forbidden strength of five."

One of the players to disconnect, was me. I was the third, to disconnect. The fourth went to fountain and danced. The fifth kept fighting: he voted to keep fighting, and he kept fighting for every pixel. Good for you. The rest of the team, wanted to stop fighting.

[sg-zephyr]

Let us report the one player who DC'd and did not return, and then start a new game. Three of the four agree: we don't want to continue this game, with our inhibitor down.

That game wasn't going to go to twenty minutes; one of the four players was always going to vote no, no matter what, eternally.

[sg-soraka]

I think, we should have the option of early surrender at 10 minutes, requiring a vote of 4/5. Or a unanimous vote, if there is less than 5 players.

Minute 15 is when "standard surrender" starts.

[sg-soraka]

League has been pressing for "a shorter game." We need actually lower surrender timers, where the rules actually allow us to surrender early.

[sg-shisa]

I'm glad for that one person who wants to keep fighting, I honestly support their desire to fight no matter what: but two people have DC'd, and our inhibitor is down.

We want to surrender.

We need to have rules that will allow us to surrender.

[slayer-pantheon-rainbows]

Sometimes a player goes 1-11; even 1-11 before 12 minutes, and their one kill was a KS they did not take with honour, or deserve. I'm glad the troll player can continue diving the full health enemy team while their at 20% health [I'm not making this up!!!], and then be the one vote to prevent a surrender and force us to keep playing the game. The current surrender rules are great for trolls!

[zombie-brand-clap]

Is this the game we all want to play???! I think there's a very realistic fix.

[slayer-jinx-catface]

Early surrender at 10 minutes

[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]

Normal surrender at 15 minutes

Or give us the ability to control champions who's summoners have disconnected.

[slayer-pantheon-rainbows]

Let me report the person who did dc. . .don't punish 75% of the remaining team.

[galio-happy]