Friendly + bad vs Toxic + good

FaytalityHD·Oct 25, 2016·1 votes·540 views

The bad but friendly guy who makes the game impossible to win regardless of your performance effectively wasting 20 minutes of your time + the time it takes for you to get back those LP and the probability of him being a troll who doesnt surrender despite the game being lost 100% ( dont you love those) or The toxic(not including hate speech etc) but good player you could always mute who is likely to carry you and give you free LP in an environment where winning should be most important(ranked)

7 Comments

BranagenOct 25, 20166 votes

A nice bad guy that will listen can take X items and wards, go top/bot and split push like mad but pull back when pinged.

There should be no place for toxic players, and the punishment for all types of toxicity should be much stricter.

Nameless VoiceOct 25, 20161 votes

Exactly this.

Mecha MaIphiteOct 25, 20166 votes

Trash players can be carried. Toxic players can tilt your entire team, go AFK, or cause someone else to AFK from incessant flaming.

FlahertyOct 25, 20165 votes

In a realistic setting friendly and bad is the better choice. Toxic players usually make one person on your team do worse and usually negatively affect the rest of your team so rarely are they going to carry you to victory. It's better to have 1 teammate be dead weight than have 4 teammates be potential dead weight. Of course if the loss is 100% guaranteed with the friendly player and 100% guaranteed with the toxic player it's better to have the toxic one, but rarely is a toxic person the sole carrier of a game.