Should we ban bad players?
Yes [slayer-pantheon-thumbs]
Yes [slayer-pantheon-thumbs]
90% of the servers are bad players.
90% of the server players are toxic. It's win/win.
no and unless you are master tier, u are bad.
I gave you one of them up arrow thing-a-ma-jigs. The number stayed the same. [zombie-nunu-tears]
How about now?
Same number. System is rigged. Vote Canada 2016.
lets see .. bronzies get banned, then the silvers are now the baddies.
Silvers get banned, now the gold are terrible.
Goldies are banned, I guess the plats are pretty horrible as well. Might as well ban them.
The list goes on.
In the end, only Faker will remain.
Then he'll be banned.
No, they shouldn't be banned. Yes, they should be restricted from ruining other people's games and educated on how to improve their play.
Any jerk can play chess. If you play against someone who is familiar with moves, counterplay, mind games, etc, then your amateur "omg the horsey moves" ass gets destroyed. In a competitive 5v5... if one or 2 or 3 people on your team are diddling the horse while you're trying to make a Q to B6 checkmate move it's not fucking fun to play with them and the MMR system isn't enough to help combat this issue. Even more so in lower ranks.
probibly why theres skill based ranked system.
probibly why theres skill based ranked system.
It's not good enough. Bronze has everything from 2 year olds walking into a wall half the game to players who know how to play and should be gold but haven't figured out they need to sit on one of their best champions and carry every fucking lane and the jungle to get out of it.
and if u play in bronz you will inevitably climb up, its not like silver is better, as you get better the environment gets better. The thought of taking bad players out of bad queues so other bad players can have a better time of things doesnt seem to me that its helping the goal of improvement
and if u play in bronz you will inevitably climb up, its not like silver is better, as you get better the environment gets better. The thought of taking bad players out of bad queues so other bad players can have a better time of things doesnt seem to me that its helping the goal of improvement
Yes, statistically they'll climb. After x number of games. But I think it would be useful to have someone who went 0/20 in ranked on a yasou be told they need to play 3 normal games before they can play ranked again or some other bar to prevent them from single handedly losing the game for their next team.
Well if they banned bad players from the beginning, nobody would be playing the game because everyone was bad at one point.
Probably not ban, but there should be some sort of punishment in ranked, and if not, then at the very least the bad players teammates shouldn't be punished.
There already is a punishment. They lose LP and fall in rank.
Not any more than if they had a perfect game though, but still lost. I think thats a pretty big problem, whether you feed in a game or play perfectly but get bad teammates causing a loss, you lose the same amount of LP.
But that would mean that only those who had been playing for a long time would be allowed to play the game.
It's a team game. That's how team games work. Some times you play masterfully, but someone else on your team messes up and costs you. In baseball, you can play a perfect game, hit 4/4 with 4 home runs, field at the highest possible level for your position, and if the rest of your team does nothing and gives up 10 runs, you get the loss the same way your teammates do. It works the same in every single team sport in existence.
I don't want to be that guy that just goes "like it or leave it", but league is, and always has been, a team game and that's not going to change. People that can't stand that may be better off finding another game. Single player games do exist for a reason. Some people just don't like counting on others to influence their game, and that's fine. There's nothing wrong with feeling that way, and wanting to be judged solely on one's own individual performance. But League isn't the game for that, and expecting it to be isn't really reasonable.
Depends on how you define "bad" I guess. If you mean unskilled, then obviously not. If you mean people who act like children and make you never want to play another game with them in your life, then sure, I'm all for that.
No they should not be banned, but Riot should do something to help rank making it more fun rather than a 37vs9 end of game kind of game. Where the game is not even close to being a tie sort of speak.
Riot needs to bring a tutorial that all players must participate in (Unless you are like diamond+). The tutorial would teach the players the importance of farming, when to group/gank, how to counter build, etc.
Or, Riot can have a system where it tracks how well you do in Norms. To see if you are ready for Ranked.
#Approval
No
Yes
No one was born good at League, mate. Not even Faker. So, no, bad players should not be banned.
There is a 12 year old kid in korea that got diamond 3.
Also a 9 year old girl that got platinum in Brazil.
I fail to see how that makes my argument incorrect.
There are people that are just good at any videogame.
Also people that are bad at every videogame.
Some people can get better, others are good from the start, and others no matter how much they try will always be bad.
what about you get gud?
I mean the game did, it banned you.
simply put , theres a reason why we have a ranked system, you play with those who you equal. those who play normals will just have to deal with bad people. if u dont want bad people then climb the ranks
if you mean "bad players" in the sense they are bad members of the community and toxic then yes. people that aren't the best at playing the actual game than nah some people just play casually and for fun.