I knew I shouldn't have cut down what I wrote for brevity; I was going to address this but I thought it would be better to get straight to the clear point.
{quoted}
her ult was arguably shit early it makes her a sitting duck it had no proper attack damage scale it scales with mostly magic damage to fuel a terrible gimmick "ap MF" that the community refuses to let die.her ult is the same now but it can crit and now has a proper ad scale her new passive from strut got a decent numbers buff though its getting a nerf on the PBE her new passive is a % damage increase to each new target which is great and slightly better then her old passive since it needed to be ramped up.
overall she does the things she used to do but she just does them better
The players are what is arguably shit. No one who hasn't just started or isn't a complete idiot would sit there and use Xerath's Ultimate or Cait's Ultimate when an enemy is just there beating on them. So why is it that when these same utterly incompetent idiots who misuse their abilities do it with Fortune's Ult and QQ about how she sucks, people take them seriously? Even if their complaints were remotely credible, it's fine that it would have a drawback on account that it is among the strongest in it's class.
I could go on and talk about how you wrote false things about it's AD scaling but none of that really matters because you are ignoring the point:
Her ult was not "shit" because it was
factually, numerically, objectively, stronger than almost every comparable ultimate, doing more damage than most any other nuking ultimate in the game AND was AoE.