Warwick Rework: Probably never?
With the number of times Warwick's reworks have been announced and then trashed, I'm assuming he'll never be actually reworked, or that such a rework will take until 2020.
#Prove me wrong, Riot.
With the number of times Warwick's reworks have been announced and then trashed, I'm assuming he'll never be actually reworked, or that such a rework will take until 2020.
#Prove me wrong, Riot.
Hope they make his animations seem more feral. (Running on all fours etc.)
Homeguard animation perhaps
WW and shaco are both on the queue for a rework
shaco was suggested to be coming and ww is supposed to be coming soon but not as soon as shaco's
I'm expecting Riot to say "We goofed again, WW's delayed 4 more years".
Yorick had this treatment for a long while, now look at him. He's finally getting a rework.
Maybe so, but Warwick's had this treatment for longer and more times than Yorick. And arguably Warwick is a bigger problem because of his no-real-outplay ult.
Yorick is arguably more anti fun to play against though. He's sustainy, wins every trade against 9 out of every 10 champions. At least you can QSS Warwick's ult.
There's almost nobody that can lane vs Yorick.
The problem is that Yorick doesn't do anything outside of splitpushing effectively. Warwick at least can shut down assassins super easily with Infinite Duress.
Yorick is actually really oppressive this season. He has a unholy synergy with the heal increasing and HP recovering masteries like Grasp of the Undying and the Strength of the ages.
He scales really hard with them, hard enough to oppress a MUNDO in lane.
Maybe so, but Warwick's had this treatment for longer and more times than Yorick. And arguably Warwick is a bigger problem because of his no-real-outplay ult.
QSS.
Riot doesn't like QSS as the only means of counterplay/outplay against Warwick (unless you're GP, Olaf, or Alistar).
Riot doesn't like QSS as the only means of counterplay/outplay against Warwick (unless you're GP, Olaf, or Alistar).
I mean, clearly they do, or there would be more.