The problem with "Fixing X champion"

I NEED HEALlNG·Dec 28, 2017·1 votes·305 views

I'm going to use the fixing AP shaco post for example the whole problem i have with this is that the moment ap shaco becomes viable, he becomes so utterly broken and unfun to play against. I understand why they nerfed him. 3 nukes on low cdr abilities aren't fun to deal with. That's the problem i have with these "fixing the champion" posts. You fix them, they become fun for one person and utterly unbearable for the enemy team and therefore: just unfair and unfun. He has these problems and nerfs for a reason i feel. Please explain to me how fixing these problems would fix the specific champ's toxicity.

I feel like a lot of things people want fix would just utterly do a Ornn to these champs they speak of. I notice it's usually the toxic ones that have been nerfed to the ground for reason. Please explain why people don't seem to take this into consideration? I want to know

3 Comments

MordepoolDec 28, 20171 votes

This post is why for the most part I only want Morde to receive bug fixes. Instead of any buff

EkitaihDec 28, 20171 votes

Unfortunately in a game with so many variables, it's literally impossible to make the game "balanced" as so many people want. Everyone has a counter and a weakness. You have to adjust to play-styles. I'm not sure the point of your post, whether you are for or against "Fixing X champion" but that's my opinion.

I NEED HEALlNGDec 29, 20171 votes

{quoted}

Unfortunately in a game with so many variables, it's literally impossible to make the game "balanced" as so many people want. Everyone has a counter and a weakness. You have to adjust to play-styles. I'm not sure the point of your post, whether you are for or against "Fixing X champion" but that's my opinion.

there was a top post about fixing shaco, and over the years i've seen posts about fixing champions. I never understood why nobody usually take into consideration that fixing that champion would kinda make them broken