PTA vs Conquerors

Bultz··1 votes·1,686 views

Conquerors is probably the best choice for melee champions, but PTA just completely overshadowed it. 35 ad and 20% true damage is good, but 180 damage and 12% damage from all sources is much much better. Either pta needs to be nerfed or Conquerors needs a buff. The gap is to large in fights.

2 Comments

Masala Chai1 votes

Conqueror is way better in teamfights because it's target agnostic, it makes dealing with tanks way easier as a melee carry much easier since true damage cannot be blocked by resistances. Press The Attack requires a focus on a singular champion, something that can often be negated to be stacked on a target that often ends up being a tank due to "Hit Tanks" phase of teamfights when they initially breakout, especially as skirmishers or ADCs.

Not to mention you're kind of blindly comparing the fact that PTA has a cooldown before it can be triggered on another target. Conqueror can be refreshed by most bruisers.

Plus add the fact that most Plat+ Bruisers are taking Conqueror, and it's even bled into ADCs who aren't supposed to be taking Conqueror with ADCs like Draven taking this keystone.

ProfDrDeath1 votes

Conqueror is actually much more damage than PTA against virtually any target.

The true damage conversion increases damage against a target by [enemy Armor]/5 in %. Against a 60 Armor target, which everyone exceeds by level 18, that is a 12% damage increase.

More from Gameplay

More by Bultz