While I like 1337 refference, Brutalizer seems flawed and over loaded limiting AD item build paths
Reasoning behind this issue?
Let us say that there was an AD item costing around 800 to 900 gold that gave unique passive: 10% CDR and 15 AD building from only a
. There would be a fair number of build concepts opened up with something like that.
Compare the 8 items that long sword builds into with the 12 that Amp tome builds into or the 17 that ruby crystal builds into. And jsut for reference 8 for pick axe, 6 for blasting wand, 5 for giant's belt 4 for BF sword 6 for NLR
AD items with secondary stats seems to be lacking when compared to AP and health.
As it stands the only item you can build from a single
that you are likely to ever get is a
since no one gets 
So while I like the LEET reference of 1337 on Brutalizer it might be for the best if Brutalizer was divided into 2 different items One with CDR and the other with armor pen.
Just an observation. I don't expect anything done about this since a lot of people love Brutalizer but it is limiting the creation of other items from happening given that it is both the AD armor pen and CDR item.
is the same thing with
. It has the same behavior. People don't rush liandrys.
. Mostly Riven players that are starter buy it.