I wouldn't have a problem with DynamicQ... If....

Kaisa is Hot·May 11, 2016·4 votes·422 views

If there were no 3, 4, 5 premade group queues.. Just should have made it like SoloQ with a 2 set role picker. People would get the best of both worlds. Still being able to duo queue or solo, with the added option of pre picking your prefered role/roles.

You may say league is better with friends, but that's your opinion. How many were in favour of Dynamic queue again % wise? Somewhere in the higher 50s. Some people find the game better when it's more challenging (SoloQ).

2 Comments

Snowball4uMay 11, 20162 votes

TBH I think 3 man queues are fine. 4 & 5 man however I dislike.

with 4 man groups, since I am ususally solo, they are normally the deciding factor of who wins the game. And If my team is the worse 4 man group, we usually lose.

5 man queues aren't TOO bad, I just hate how they are in the same queue with us.

For example, my school has a league team which plays in tournaments (HSL for the most part). I'm "not online enough" to be on the team, so another plat 5 kid is on their who is slightly worse than me. But you know what? Hes diamond now. How you ask? He got boosted by the 2 master on my team. I'm not saying this guy is bad at the game. But he is no way skilled enough to be diamond.

My point: This just seems completely unfair and wrong how anyone with a higher elo friend that is willing to boost them will be able to reach gold, plat, diamond, etc because they are able to have many people carrying them (4 is mostly what I'm complaining about).

TLDR Agreed

Dr WMay 11, 20162 votes

I wouldn't have a problem with Dynamic Queue if it was Solo Queue. Its beyond retarded there is no separate ranking for ranked 5's teams anymore. See no reason to really play ranked.