The ability to 100-0 an enemy almost instantly as ANYONE will be forbidden in League's future, yes?

darkdill··4 votes·587 views

Even if it was meant to be a Champion's reason to be picked, would that still be prohibited?

I ask this because of the assassin reworks and how people are complaining about Syndra on Reddit.

9 Comments

dakota saturn5 votes

No one has a problem with Syndra 100-0'ing someone.

Everyone has a problem when she can miss all of her skillshots and still kill anyone anyway with a single R press.

I think it's healthy when there is actually something you can do to prevent a champ from killing you. Having an automatic 100% death spell that you can't stop once the animation begins, on a point and click is absolutely ridiculous.

MunchCrunchLunch1 votes

lmao. thats exactly it.

Vistha Kai4 votes

Frankly, she can't 100-0 somebody with ult alone without landing anything else, unless considerably ahead.

...or that ADC having no MR whatsoever.

Still the problem with her ult isn't the damage, believe it or not. It's the availability of it.

Thanks to the cancer MYMU you grab some CDR and you can walk with 7-sphere ult at all times. Before MYMU it had to be set up durning an engage which took about 10 seconds and had a window of like 2 seconds to be used and should you miss it, you had to redo the whole thing from scratch. That's why the most common ults were 5- and 6- sphere ones, which aren't able to 100-0 anyone, except for that one guy who was AFK for 10 minutes.

I'm sure you can see how it was fair back then.

Saianna1 votes

Frankly, she can't 100-0 somebody with ult alone without landing anything else, unless considerably ahead.

Saw that happen on full HP Ezreal. Her gold-lead was almost non-existent as she wasn't back to shop to buy [ARAM].

So.. yeah It happens.

Vistha Kai1 votes

I'd like to see that game and this "100-0 at full HP without items".

Saianna1 votes

you serious?

It was like in 20th minute of teh game. Obviously she had items. But she still had lots of gold from kills, which she couldn't spend cause has not died ...

Vistha Kai1 votes

No, I mean I'd like to literally see that game.

When did it happen?

ValyrianBlade2 votes

I think 100-0 when even shouldn't exist in general.

It's perfectly fine though if the player is already ahead.

You're trading in lane, get them to 40%, kill them with a combo, that's fine. Do it a second time, fine. Then 100-0 them almost instantly if that's your identity, fine. Some champions can healthily have an identity where if their jungler gets them early kills or they earn them themselves, they can start instantly popping people when their ultimate is up - cool. Being able to do it by virtue of the champion when even/behind is problematic. Not even just 100-0 - it's annoying that a Xin or Jax or Nasus can 1v1 someone when they're 1/6/0 and the other guy is also a strong duelist and is 6/1/0 just because they have 4 items (even cs) - but at least there's counterplay there. There really isn't counterplay to 100-0 when the guy doing it is even/behind.

Escheton1 votes

Sure it should exist. If you walk around with 30mr and no extra health a magic dmg assassin should be able to oneshot you. Especially when ahead in levels(quite likely against an adc) and/or active gold.

More from Gameplay

More by darkdill