Rate ARURF, no bias here, just show your support.

Very Hard Engage·Sep 27, 2016·4 votes·656 views

Scale from 1 to 10

10 being - awesome sauce bring this back permanently.

5 being - you have no strong feelings one way or another.

1 - it was awful and disgraceful.

how do you feel about ARURF?

5 Comments

Mistress ShyvanaSep 27, 20164 votes

It was decent, needs to be true random with the entire champ pool enabled, OR give bans before the random champs are handed out... possibly both.

still saw the same champs over.. and over..and over even though its "random"

ShuffledPancakeSep 27, 20163 votes

[{quoted}](name=Mistress Shyvana,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=2R1dyVZO,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2016-09-27T20:58:45.106+0000)

It was decent, needs to be true random with the entire champ pool enabled, OR give bans before the random champs are handed out... possibly both.

still saw the same champs over.. and over..and over even though its "random"

That's what random is though, if you couldn't get the same champ again and again, it isn't random.

RalanrSep 27, 20164 votes

I think in the future Riot should just remove pool limitation and make it any champion in URF or combine everyone's champion pool for randomization.

The latter may mess up trading though.

NahuiSep 27, 20161 votes

I wouldn't play it all the time, but sometimes I just want a really casual mode. For now, ARAM is my casual mode for when I wanna play League but not -play- League, you know? Urf is far better than aram for this, but due to its popularity, it can't be permanent.

CatastropSep 27, 20161 votes

I gave it a 9, the only stopping me from giving it a 10 is the fact that it still chooses from your current pool instead of the entire champion pool. Also, even if I rated it 10, I still wouldn't want it to be permanent.