I hate Lulu. Her kit is disgusting, and always feeling terrible after playing against her, I've resolved to never let her in any of my games ever again. If she's not meta though, is it bad for me to ban her instead of whatever might be meta?
Lapis4 votesNo, it's fine. I ban blitzcrank for the same reason
Gall1 votesNo. I ban nami or morgana a lot for similar reasons
DerMangoJoghurt1 votesIn my opinion that's the best use of a ban.
MrHaZeYo1 votesIn lower Elos, ya ban what you don't want to deal with. In Higher Elos, ban what will prolly get picked and do work in a game.
BeatzBoyFTW1 votesI mean we're not pro players. I'd still ban Zed if I want to, instead of Taliyah whom almost don't get played much in soloQ.
WitchQueen Annie1 votesNo. In fact you should ban what you can’t play against, not necessarily what is meta.
saltran1 votesNo, ban whatever you want, that'si why I only ban Yasuo when I play MF
Bobloser35551 votesNo dont think so, I ban Illaoi because she is anti fun.
Friendly Ram1 votesNah haven't seen vayne outside of aram for awhile.
Malix Farwin1 votesI find that anyone who tries to tell you who to ban are typically bad anyways and will be bad regardless of who you ban.
Revali1 votesHate banning is a very good strategy, if you have an Achilles heel to a champ with who you main/champ pool, it's best to get rid of them 9/10 times.
Mr Dalloway1 votesBan whatever tilts you most in the position you are going to be playing. Currently I have been playing immobile mages mid and Zac jungle is my nemesis so I usually ban him rather than an annoying mid champ. If I come across something else that is more annoying or more common I'll switch to that. If something is going to tilt you and make you lose lane horribly I don't think there is a downside to banning it.
heroikc1 votesMost of the champs I hate are typically too annoying for anyone to bother with anyway.
