Title. Normal, Ranked, Draft Normal, it's terrible. The matchmaking is absolutely horrible. I get placed with people with 500 or less games some with 37 normal wins and play vs people with 700+ normal wins. Why is this fair. And dynamic Q... We already know how many threads about plat promos with silver... It's just not fair.
Beoridas1 votesmatch making based on amount of games played makes no sense. Its what you do with these games that matters.
If ive played 1000 games but i have a 50% win rate at bronze, well 200 games with 50% win rate at bronze is pretty much the same.
GULAG 4 U1 votes2k games in bronze at 50% win rate vs 200, there is a difference.
Beoridas1 votesok what is the difference? they have proven to be the EXACT same skill level. only difference i can see is the champ pool.
You have no ranked games as i can tell. I play with plat 2 and diamond with 100 to 600 games and the skills is what you have proven to achieve. What about smurfs? that can be very deceiving.
Actually, in the ranking world, its much much more ill perceived to have 2k games with 50% win rate than 200. The one with 2000 has proven consistency in low level play and the inability to learn and get better while the 200 game guy still have that potential. Ive played tons of times with low games stacks versus much higher stacks and won easily. You put value in numbers where there is none, its the skills and end results that matters.
its like saying the guy who got a C- on the same subject exam 2000 times is somehow better than the one who did it 200 times. very flawed way of thinking. So a 2k games bronze guy should be better than a 400 games gold guy? that makes no sense whatsoever. Games are a mean to an end, the skills/rank is the end result. So it doesnt matter how many houses you have built; if they are all shitty, then your experience is irrelevant.
