Skip to content

XiaoWeiXiao's statement.

Colgate Gator··36 votes·3,855 views

"Hi, I’m TiP XiaoWeiXiao, I feel very sorry to everyone. Because of my ignorance, I did not realize ELO boosting is a such severe incident, so it happened. "

Yeah, ok, sure, even bronze 5 players knows that ELO boosting is a big deal and often met with harsh punishments, and they don't know how to last-hit.

If you're going to apologize for getting caught red-handed and letting your fans down at the worst time possible (with the finals incoming and whatnot), by all means do it, but don't bullshit them.

58 Comments

Mongoose26 votes

its less severe in china where he comes from

AutoreactiveCD412 votes

Culture is important when you look into incidents like these. Also English is his second language so the statement may not be as elegantly worded as it could or should have been. You're going to look at his actions from here on to see how sincere he is.

Transgressor6 votes

No, not really. English is my second language as well, I have no trouble "wording myself". Game rules apply to everyone. Even when if you're playing in space, where the concept of culture and law literaly does not apply, game rules still hold because they are in their own isolated controled environment. No matter your culture, flaming is against the summoners code, so is boosting, scripting, trolling etc etc. It's not a matter of severity, we're talking about game rules, not laws with cultural impact(and culture that impacts the justice system).

AutoreactiveCD414 votes

What's your first language and how long you've been speaking English could matter. An alternative is he just sucks at PR, there are people like that regardless of language. I'm not going to judge him as a person based on this statement, it's funny cause it reminds me of an old stand up line "I'm sorry officer I didn't know I couldn't do that."

The rules do apply to everyone, true. But depending on many factors people will choose to disregard certain rules. Different people will view rules and laws based on their way of thinking, which may be influenced by culture. It's a messy area and debatable from many angles but I do see your point. He broke the rules he should be punished, I absolutely agree. He may not have understood why what he did was so wrong, this IS something that can be difficult between cultures sometimes. Trust me I've had a foreign roommate that didn't understand why America's value personal space.

Maybe he wouldn't have done this if he understood why it was so wrong in the first place. Of course he could not care, be happy with the cash he got and just wants to not be suspended anymore.

Gaxx D4 votes

Only that he wrote his statement in CHINESE, that was only translation. He's sitting in US for 1,5 year now and still can't use english. Meanwhile Huni, who's living in Germany with Fnatic picked up english in less than half of a year. Sure, it's not perfect, but you can easily understand him, and he's fine communicating in english. XWX is just a lazy fat ass.

Simplicate2 votes

Try picking up a language and report back to me on how easy it was.

DeathToHeretics2 votes

He's not saying it's easy. He's saying that Huni was able to learn English in less than half a year, while XWX has had 3x as long to learn the same language and hasn't. Not to mention that Huni wasn't even in a country that speaks English as its main language.

Gaxx D1 votes

Well guess what - I was able to communicate in english 3 months after I started learning it, 4 months for french. And I wasn't pressured or anything, as in, I wasn't living in a country where english or french were being used. If you actually put minimum effort into learning the EASIEST LANGUAGE ON THIS PLANET, you can communicate with others. At least you can understand what others say to you, and you don't need a translator following you like a dog (he still freakin needs one when they want to interview him - for both his answers and to explain to him what he was asked about). My point stands.

Rinky Dinky2 votes

Keep in mind going from an asian language to english is harder than any other jump.

Completely different structure, almost nothing in common.

Different alphabet even.

French to English is basic.

Spanish to English is moderate.

But English to Japanese, or Chinese? Goddamn thats a struggle compared.

1 and a half years is certainly more than enough time though I agree

Maratsune2 votes

Wait, did you just say English is the easiest language on the planet? Because...er... that's just straight up wrong

Eleshakai2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=00020000000100000001,timestamp=2015-07-25T06:47:12.982+0000)

Well guess what - I was able to communicate in english 3 months after I started learning it, 4 months for french. And I wasn't pressured or anything, as in, I wasn't living in a country where english or french were being used. If you actually put minimum effort into learning the EASIEST LANGUAGE ON THIS PLANET, you can communicate with others. At least you can understand what others say to you, and you don't need a translator following you like a dog (he still freakin needs one when they want to interview him - for both his answers and to explain to him what he was asked about). My point stands.

English is actually widely considered the second or third hardest language to learn due to the number of exceptions and 'broken' rules it has. It's not the easiest language.

But I agree with your point... if he'd really wanted to learn it, he'd be communicable by now.

Gaxx D2 votes

There's no source that shows english even in top 30 hardest languages to learn. There's a reason it's international language. And that reason is - it's easier to learn than other languages. Compare that to any of the skandinavian, slavic, asiatic languages out there. There's NO comparison. And trust me, there's more exceptions and "broken" rules (not to mention the difficulty of pronounciations compared to english, and the number of tenses, which in english is laughable when you compare that to other languages). Anyway, that was all off-topic.

Eleshakai2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=0002000000010000000100020000,timestamp=2015-07-25T16:56:56.766+0000)

There's no source that shows english even in top 30 hardest languages to learn. There's a reason it's international language. And that reason is - it's easier to learn than other languages. Compare that to any of the skandinavian, slavic, asiatic languages out there. There's NO comparison. And trust me, there's more exceptions and "broken" rules (not to mention the difficulty of pronounciations compared to english, and the number of tenses, which in english is laughable when you compare that to other languages). Anyway, that was all off-topic.

...... English has no rules. People learn languages by learning rules.

https://www.oxford-royale.co.uk/articles/learning-english-hard.html

The first line:

"It’s often said that English is one of the hardest languages to learn."

English is an extremely difficult language to learn. It's not THE HARDEST but it's definitely up there.

Gaxx D1 votes

An article written by who exactly? A struggling student? Certainly not a linguist. What you just linked me is an article based off of an opinion. Viable sources show skandinavian, asiatic and slavic languages as the hardest languages to learn. Period.

Eleshakai2 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=000200000001000000010002000000000000,timestamp=2015-07-25T17:22:32.172+0000)

An article written by who exactly? A struggling student? Certainly not a linguist. What you just linked me is an article based off of an opinion. Viable sources show skandinavian, asiatic and slavic languages as the hardest languages to learn. Period.

http://jakubmarian.com/is-english-a-hard-language/ <-- there's one by a linguist, if you must insist.

Just as an aside, I have 6 or 7 more articles by various members of the linguistics community if you insist on pursuing this.

The reality is that no language is going to be difficult for everyone to learn, but in general English is CONSIDERED to be one of the hardest to learn. It may not be hard for you, but it IS hard to learn in general due to the logical flaws in it. Edit 2: The fact that you put a 'period' at the end when discussing something as absurdly subjective as learning languages proves that you don't know what you're talking about. So I think we're done here.

Edit: Oh, and the reason why 'most lists don't rank English as being the hardest' is because most lists are written FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOMEONE WHO KNOWS ENGLISH.

I found 20 different 'top x hardest language' lists, and they're ALL written, if you read them closely, as the 'top x hardest languages FOR AN ENGLISH SPEAKER to learn'. So that's why so many lists don't rank English.

Gaxx D1 votes

If it wasn't obvious, english isn't even close to being my native language. I'm Polish and in my time I've learned german, french, english, a bit of italian, russian and czech. And recently I've started to learn japanese. English was definitely the easiest one to learn. If your argument is that english is illogical, therfore hard to learn, then you really should try to learn a foreign language on your own, and see if that theory applies in reality.

Eleshakai1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=00020000000100000001000200000000000000000000,timestamp=2015-07-25T19:34:37.922+0000)

If it wasn't obvious, english isn't even close to being my native language. I'm Polish and in my time I've learned german, french, english, a bit of italian, russian and czech. And recently I've started to learn japanese. English was definitely the easiest one to learn. If your argument is that english is illogical, therfore hard to learn, then you really should try to learn a foreign language on your own, and see if that theory applies in reality.

Congratulations, you have a natural gift for languages AND you started off with a language(Polish) that was very close to English to begin with. Polish, German, and other similar languages to that are very similar in root to English. So naturally English would be easier FOR YOU to learn because of your root. Perfectly logical. But that doesn't mean that it is NOT a difficult language to learn in general.

It's all perspective... your comments come from the perspective of someone who is not only naturally gifted for learning languages but ALSO someone who was in just about the absolute ideal position for making English easier(German as a first language would've probably been the only one easier).

But if you look at it from an unbiased perspective and simply evaluate the details of the various languages... English has numerous aspects that make it incredibly difficult to learn for the average person.

Gaxx D1 votes

I'm sorry, but you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, when you're comparing slavic language to germanic. Yes, you can find some similarity in certain words, but that's the case for basically any language in the world. The structure of the languages is completely diferent. Even amongst germanic languages, English is extremely simplified. Take conjugation as an example and an irregular, yet most basic verb "to be". English: I am, He/she/it is, You, We, They are. German: Ich bin, Du bist, Er/sie(singular)/Es ist, Wir/sie(plural)/Sie sind, Ihr seid That's the same family of languages (germanic), and trust me - this is not the only example. Now Romanic family (latin), in this case French: Je suis, Tu es, Il/Elle est, Nous sommes, Vous etes, Ills/Elles sont. And now slavic family - Polish: Ja jestem, Ty jesteś, On/Ona jest, My jesteśmy, Wy jesteście, Oni/One są.

And if that's not enough, I like to use another example when comparing English to Polish (a bit extreme, but serves it's purpose): declension of a number 2 (two): English: Two, Second Polish: dwa, dwie, dwoje, dwóch (or dwu), dwaj, dwiema, dwom (or dwóm), dwoma, dwojga, dwojgu, dwojgiem, dwójka, dwójki, dwójkę, dwójką, dwójce, dwójko (and also ordinal number - drugi, druga, drugie, drudzy, drugie, drugiego, drugiej, drugich, drugiemu, drugim, drugą, drugimi). Moreover english uses most basic latin alphabet, whereas germanic, slavic, romanic languages (I mention only these 3 language families, since I was basing my examples on them) use modified latin alphabets, with added letters with diacritics, acute accents, overdots, tails and strokes. I could go on (like about a sheer difference in number of tenses between english and other languages), but if you didn't understand my point till now, then there's no point.

Oh, and in regards to my "natural gift for languages". I found Russian (which is an east slavic language - a subgroup to slavic languages, Polish belongs to west group) much more harder to learn than english (and there are many words in Russian and Polish that are the same), which is why I ultimately dropped it.

Simplicate1 votes

Basically what I'm getting from you is that if it's easy for you to do then that's how it works for everyone which would in fact be wrong.

Ale non è male2 votes

Anyone who claim that English is a difficult language is an idiot or a very biased person towards English Just look at how much more complicated is the grammatical conjugation of the verbs in Spanish or Italian, that according to your lists/thoughts would be classified as some of the "easiest" languages to learn in comparison with English... and then come here to say again English is difficult Or look at German declension that descends directly from Latin English became the most used international language BECAUSE it is kinda EASY to learn, not because it is difficult Heck, the argumentations shown in the link really disprove your theory. Ortography would be a problem? Why? The alphabet used is the basic latin alphabet. Are you really comparing it to German or slavic alphabet - not even mentioning Asian or Arab alphabets? Vocabulary? The only difficulty in English are the false friends words, and when you have learned the most common false friends you are pretty much ok. Also, I would add, English vocabulary is far from bein really deep when comparing, let's say, to Italian ancient language (which is drying up lately but is still far wider than English), so , again, what are you talking about? Pronunciation? F**k off, if other languages speaking people should be as pedantic as English and French people are, you would comprehend as there is no really overcomplicated things in English. Even when non-English mother tongue people do some mistake with pronunciation, you can definitively understand in the context of the phrase what is the word they are pronuncing, so it creates no big problem in normal conversations. If someone should point out how foreign people mistake the stress, for example, in Italian language, despite Italian having strict rules and at times even graphic accent to avoid the confusion it happen in English pronunciation at times, one could really argue how English lack of rules does not really represent an element of difficulty...and that is the biggest challange in learning English, so English really represents the easisest langage to learn in the world

Eleshakai1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Ale non è male,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=00020000000100000001000200000000000000000001,timestamp=2015-07-26T10:34:50.374+0000)

Anyone who claim that English is a difficult language is an idiot or a very biased person towards English Just look at how much more complicated is the grammatical conjugation of the verbs in Spanish or Italian, that according to your lists/thoughts would be classified as some of the "easiest" languages to learn in comparison with English... and then come here to say again English is difficult Or look at German declension that descends directly from Latin English became the most used international language BECAUSE it is kinda EASY to learn, not because it is difficult Heck, the argumentations shown in the link really disprove your theory. Ortography would be a problem? Why? The alphabet used is the basic latin alphabet. Are you really comparing it to German or slavic alphabet - not even mentioning Asian or Arab alphabets? Vocabulary? The only difficulty in English are the false friends words, and when you have learned the most common false friends you are pretty much ok. Also, I would add, English vocabulary is far from bein really deep when comparing, let's say, to Italian ancient language (which is drying up lately but is still far wider than English), so , again, what are you talking about? Pronunciation? F**k off, if other languages speaking people should be as pedantic as English and French people are, you would comprehend as there is no really overcomplicated things in English. Even when non-English mother tongue people do some mistake with pronunciation, you can definitively understand in the context of the phrase what is the word they are pronuncing, so it creates no big problem in normal conversations. If someone should point out how foreign people mistake the stress, for example, in Italian language, despite Italian having strict rules and at times even graphic accent to avoid the confusion it happen in English pronunciation at times, one could really argue how English lack of rules does not really represent an element of difficulty...and that is the biggest challange in learning English, so English really represents the easisest langage to learn in the world

No... it's the main language in the world because the world grew during the era of the British Empire. The concept of the 'global world' was headed by massive expansion of an empire that spoke English. So everyone who wanted to deal with the British Empire began speaking English, and thus the entire world started using it.(and after their decline, the US took over who also spoke English.)

Learn your freaking history before trying to talk such things.

The majority of the world finds English hard to learn, so I guess the majority of the world are idiots. Only you and Gaxx seem to disagree. Out of EVERYONE I'VE EVER HEARD TALK ON THE SUBJECT. Out of every article I've found, every list I've found that wasn't based around English.

But fine, if you want to disagree I clearly can't convince you that your personal experience with the language is just that, personal, and not indicative of everyone else.

Gaxx D1 votes

Did you actually read the article you linked here? Or just looked at the headline and thought "Oh yeah, this proves my theory, which I pulled out of my ass, based off of nothing - just some opinions of people who have general learning disability"? The only thing author is complainning about is pronunciation, which is far from perfect in English.

Some quotes from the article:

"Some people say that English has complicated grammatical rules, but this really isn’t the case. For example, the verb “to be” has the most forms an English verb can possible have: be, am, are, is, were, was, been, and being (i.e. 8 different forms, while most verbs have just 4).

On the other hand, French être (to be) has 40 different forms! (Just for fun: être, étant, été, suis, es, est, sommes, êtes, sont, étais, était, étions, étiez, étaient, fus, fut, fûmes, fûtes, furent, serai, seras, sera, serons, serez, seront, serait, serions, seriez, seraient, sois, soit, soyons, soyez, soient, fusse, fusses, fût, fussions, fussiez, fussent). Conjugation of verbs is much easier in English than in probably any other Indo-European language."

"Although many people complain about the English system of tenses, it is just necessary to understand what the grammatical constructions are supposed to express (without trying to directly translate everything into one’s mother tongue); for example, the phrase “I have been doing something” conveys the idea of doing something continually for a period of time in the past (and usually also continuing the action in the present). Once you understand the concept, it is much easier to apply it to any verb than in most other languages, simply because verb conjugation is much simpler."

"Similarly, English has no genders and only three different articles (the, a, an); or five, if you count the stressed variants separately. The form of articles doesn’t change according to the function of the noun in a sentence. Compare the two following sentences in English and in German: The table is big. Der Tisch ist groß. I like the colour of the table. Ich mag die Farbe des Tisches. It’s on the table. Es ist auf dem Tisch. I see the table. Ich sehe den Tisch.

In English, “the table” remains the same, whereas in German “der Tisch” (the table) changes according to the function of the noun, and this was just the pattern for masculine nouns; there’s another one for the feminine, neuter, and plural ones, giving 16 forms altogether to be remembered for what would be just “the” in English. The same applies to adjectives and other parts of speech, so English grammar can actually be considered quite rudimentary in comparison to many other languages."

It's funny how you ignore all the arguments, explaining WHY is english easier to learn than other languages (you find the very same arguments in my posts and the article you looked up - and look, I get that learning a new language whatsoever is hard for the most people, but english IS the easiest one to learn), and come back to "people I talked to said..." when you, yourself have obviously NO experience learning a foreign language. And no, majority of the world doesn't consider English a hard language to learn. A bunch of your friends is NOT a majority of the world.

Eleshakai1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=0002000000010000000100020000000000000000000100000000,timestamp=2015-07-27T03:21:49.515+0000)

Did you actually read the article you linked here? Or just looked at the headline and thought "Oh yeah, this proves my theory, which I pulled out of my ass, based off of nothing - just some opinions of people who have general learning disability"? The only thing author is complainning about is pronunciation, which is far from perfect in English.

Some quotes from the article:

"Some people say that English has complicated grammatical rules, but this really isn’t the case. For example, the verb “to be” has the most forms an English verb can possible have: be, am, are, is, were, was, been, and being (i.e. 8 different forms, while most verbs have just 4).

On the other hand, French être (to be) has 40 different forms! (Just for fun: être, étant, été, suis, es, est, sommes, êtes, sont, étais, était, étions, étiez, étaient, fus, fut, fûmes, fûtes, furent, serai, seras, sera, serons, serez, seront, serait, serions, seriez, seraient, sois, soit, soyons, soyez, soient, fusse, fusses, fût, fussions, fussiez, fussent). Conjugation of verbs is much easier in English than in probably any other Indo-European language."

"Although many people complain about the English system of tenses, it is just necessary to understand what the grammatical constructions are supposed to express (without trying to directly translate everything into one’s mother tongue); for example, the phrase “I have been doing something” conveys the idea of doing something continually for a period of time in the past (and usually also continuing the action in the present). Once you understand the concept, it is much easier to apply it to any verb than in most other languages, simply because verb conjugation is much simpler."

"Similarly, English has no genders and only three different articles (the, a, an); or five, if you count the stressed variants separately. The form of articles doesn’t change according to the function of the noun in a sentence. Compare the two following sentences in English and in German: The table is big. Der Tisch ist groß. I like the colour of the table. Ich mag die Farbe des Tisches. It’s on the table. Es ist auf dem Tisch. I see the table. Ich sehe den Tisch.

In English, “the table” remains the same, whereas in German “der Tisch” (the table) changes according to the function of the noun, and this was just the pattern for masculine nouns; there’s another one for the feminine, neuter, and plural ones, giving 16 forms altogether to be remembered for what would be just “the” in English. The same applies to adjectives and other parts of speech, so English grammar can actually be considered quite rudimentary in comparison to many other languages."

It's funny how you ignore all the arguments, explaining WHY is english easier to learn than other languages (you find the very same arguments in my posts and the article you looked up - and look, I get that learning a new language whatsoever is hard for the most people, but english IS the easiest one to learn), and come back to "people I talked to said..." when you, yourself have obviously NO experience learning a foreign language. And no, majority of the world doesn't consider English a hard language to learn. A bunch of your friends is NOT a majority of the world.

Get over yourself. English is hard because as a language it lacks a single defined root, and as a result none of it works together. Every other language has one root. English is literally the only language piecemealed the way it is, and as a result there is no cohesion. You can't learn English by learning, you have to learn it by literally memorizing every word and every interaction.

Most languages you can learn patterns and bases and they will give you the basics of the language. Not with English, you have to literally learn everything one word and interaction at a time.

No part of English makes sense with any other part of English, and that's what makes it hard.

But realistically, you're only looking at it from your own perspective, which is fine... but you're an abnormality. Not the norm.

Gaxx D1 votes

I'm just going to quote you:

Congratulations, you have a natural gift for languages AND you started off with a language(Polish) that was very close to English to begin with.

So first you're saying, that my native language is somehow close to English, and now, that English is so darn different from any other language in the world, and that makes it difficult? You're spouting nonsense, just to make your arguments look viable, even if you're contradicting yourself. Like I said, the only "hard" (though it's more like it's just dumb, not hard) thing in the english is pronunciation. Again - try to learn a foreign language on your own, instead of basing your opinion on other people's opinions (who apparently have innate learning issues themselves). That will actually make you more believable.

And by the way, I wasn't learning English by memorizing every single word and every interaction. Yes, my English isn't perfect, though my vocabulary isn't that poor either, but the point is, English - compared to every other language I was learning (including Polish) - has a very simple set of rules you need to follow. There's much more memorizing in other languages.

Eleshakai1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Gaxx D,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=u0lhOp8N,comment-id=00020000000100000001000200000000000000000001000000000001,timestamp=2015-07-27T04:19:27.230+0000)

I'm just going to quote you:

Congratulations, you have a natural gift for languages AND you started off with a language(Polish) that was very close to English to begin with.

So first you're saying, that my native language is somehow close to English, and now, that English is so darn different from any other language in the world, and that makes it difficult? You're spouting nonsense, just to make your arguments look viable, even if you're contradicting yourself. Like I said, the only "hard" (though it's more like it's just dumb, not hard) thing in the english is pronunciation. Again - try to learn a foreign language on your own, instead of basing your opinion on other people's opinions (who apparently have innate learning issues themselves). That will actually make you more believable.

And by the way, I wasn't learning English by memorizing every single word and every interaction. Yes, my English isn't perfect, though my vocabulary isn't that poor either, but the point is, English - compared to every other language I was learning (including Polish) - has a very simple set of rules you need to follow. There's much more memorizing in other languages.

You're assuming I don't know any other languages, despite me never having said how many languages I do or don't speak and you're judging my credibility based off of the fact that I don't go about spouting off how many languages I know. It shouldn't matter. A person doesn't need to be a cook to know good food. I don't need to be a game designer to recognize a well made game. And one doesn't need to be a linguist to know how difficult a language is.

Only you and Ale, out of everyone I've ever read on the subject, spoken to on the subject, or heard think on the subject... has ever tried to claim English was 'one of the easiest languages to learn'. Period. If you can find me even ONE of these viable sources that states English is 'not one of the hardest languages' yet is not written with the assumption that we are talking about native English speakers, then we can have a discussion. Even one. Back your claim up. You said earlier "There's no source that shows english even in top 30 hardest languages to learn" - find one of these sources that shows it not among the top and show it to me.

Now I recognize that languages are subjective, so I won't say it is 'the hardest for everyone', because clearly you two learned it very easily. That's great. But it is barely a functional language, much less an easy one. I wish I'd grown up knowing a different language because of how poorly designed English was, but no matter how well I learn other languages I still grew up with English so my mind works best in it... I'll always be stuck with it, at least in my mind.

But back up your claim.

Ale non è male1 votes

You said earlier "There's no source that shows english even in top 30 hardest languages to learn" - find one of these sources that shows it not among the top and show it to me.

But back up your claim.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2013/08/learning-english

There you go. English is easy but weird. Get it

Gaxx D1 votes

The simple fact, that you compared Polish to English proves, that you're utterly clueless. Polish isn't even remotely close to English, and yet I've found that learning English was easier than learning any other language I've learned/been trying to learn. And yes, I agree. You don't have to be a great athlete, or a coach, to see if a team is good. You don't have to be a writer, to recognize if book is good or bad, or a musician, to rate a song. But you DO need proper knowledge about designing a game, if you want to be discussing the difficulties of designing a game. And the fact, that you're making so many false statements about learning English and comparing it to learning other languages (and you keep going back to "the people I talked to" argument, over and over again), just shows, that you do not posses required knowledge on the topic. You either never really tried to learn a different language, or better yet - you did try and decided it's too hard, and simply started the argument for the sake of starting the argument (though I really do hope that's not the case - you don't seem like an idiot, but that'd be both idiotic and pathetic). What I'm gettin at, I'm not gonna argue with someone about a movie THEY saw, the book THEY read, a game THEY played, or the match THEY watched, if I didn't do any of these things by myself, and just HEARD/READ about it from someone/somewhere. All I'd accomplish that way, is to make myself look like a stuck-up "know-it-all" brat. And by the way, the "official" rankings (not really official, but you probably won't find a more proper word in this case) on how hard a language is, aren't written by native English speakers that often. You'll usually find linguists from eastern/northern Europe rating these things.

Ale non è male2 votes

{quoted}

No... it's the main language in the world because the world grew during the era of the British Empire. The concept of the 'global world' was headed by massive expansion of an empire that spoke English. So everyone who wanted to deal with the British Empire began speaking English, and thus the entire world started using it.(and after their decline, the US took over who also spoke English.)

Learn your freaking history before trying to talk such things.

The majority of the world finds English hard to learn, so I guess the majority of the world are idiots. Only you and Gaxx seem to disagree. Out of EVERYONE I'VE EVER HEARD TALK ON THE SUBJECT. Out of every article I've found, every list I've found that wasn't based around English.

But fine, if you want to disagree I clearly can't convince you that your personal experience with the language is just that, personal, and not indicative of everyone else.

Except for the fact that when British Empire was at the peak of his power, namely from Elizabeth age to the American Indipendence First, and later in the 19th century following Napolean defeat till the 1 World War, French was the most important language in the world and the official diplomacy language and was more or less on par as scientific and economic language as English was So your statement about British Empire is entirely wrong

The problem is that you are stubborn in your opinion and you keep looking at the matter from the wrong perspective The fact that English does not have a unique organism that estabilish the rules of English language like other langauges do (like Accademia della Crusca for Italian, Academie francaise for French just to name some of the oldest and most famous for European langauges), that "does not have a root/pattern" , that has some elements of confusion regarding spelling and pronunciation,** DOES NOT make it difficult to learn it for people that need to learn it to do normal conversation**. At most it can make it difficult for linguistic community that tries to regulate the language and level the small differences that you can find here and there in things like pronunciation and stress placements For most of the people that could not care less if here and there there is some mispronunciation of some word, the fact that English has far simpler rules and a far lower amount of verb forms or far less tenses or a far lower amount of articles make it FAR EASIER to learn English rather than to learn any other language in the world, because there are far less things to learn and understand before being able to correctly speak and write in English Heck, I'm not exactly proficient in English (well, I am just decent in comparison with some friends that can barely say " the cat is on the table" ) , and still I can write pretty much in a correct English form for most of my post just getting some help here and there from a vocabulary when I don't know some words to correctly express my thought. I'd challenge you to write correctly in any other language you want to choose while not being proficient at it, simply using the help of a vocabulary here and there to search some words I guess I would laugh at the results as you would completely miss the correct conjugation of the verbs and/or fail to place the proper articles in a phrase

Slamurai Jack12 votes

From what I've heard, Elo Boosting is extremely common and virtually never punished for pro players in China , XWX included. I would imagine that he's been doing it for years and has only now become an issue since he's an NA pro player. If he's been doing it for years in China, it wouldn't shock me at all if he simply assumed that NA treated Elo Boosting as seriously as China does; that is, not at all.

TurquoiseYoshi11 votes

Bronze 5 players know how to last hit. They just suck at it. That, or their support Karthus decides that he should spam Q like he's in a solo lane.

Taredom2 votes

{quoted}

Bronze 5 players know how to last hit. They just suck at it. That, or their support Karthus decides that he should spam Q like he's in a solo lane.

Have my upvotes! This actually made me lol pretty hard, support karthas OP yo.

TurquoiseYoshi1 votes

Support Karthus can be good if you use W correctly and use Q sparingly. He did the opposite.

Taredom1 votes

{quoted}

Support Karthus can be good if you use W correctly and use Q sparingly. He did the opposite.

Define good? I'm sure it can work, I've seen just about anything work in that role but I feel like in pretty much every situation you would be better off with a traditional support. (One that actually wards.)

TurquoiseYoshi2 votes

Good: Lets an ADC escape a bad situation, gives a team a decent teamfight, anything other than stealing CS and slow-walling the area behind the enemy.

Taredom1 votes

{quoted}

Good: Lets an ADC escape a bad situation, gives a team a decent teamfight, anything other than stealing CS and slow-walling the area behind the enemy.

Regarding his ult, I imagine it works like support lux? Kill securing and hopefully not intentional steals?

TurquoiseYoshi1 votes

Yeah, kinda like Lux.

Poohs3 votes

That's quite dissapointing. XWX was my favourite from TiP. It's really sad to see him doing such things and than talking bullshit ..D:

Eleshakai3 votes

It's only too bad he wasn't caught earlier. Maybe TIP could be fighting for relegation in stead of seeding then.

RISE Shlack1233 votes

This is the problem with paying children to play a video game. It's just like C9 Sneaky being so toxic on stream and C9 Incarnati0n's past DDOS'ing antics.

These children make a mockery of esports and set the bar for the League community as a whole. They should be permabanned - none of this letting them back after a suspension crap. Maybe if we punished the top-tier players more harshly people would take notice.

XiaoWeiXiao will just keep ELO boosting to make up for his loss of income. He'll just be more careful about it.

Beerstein2 votes

IDK what the punishment was but I hope it was harsh, a lot of other people legitimately suffer from Elo boosting and what he has done has very directly harmed other players. Some people only ever consider themselves.

Rinky Dinky2 votes

lol he charged 1300+ dollars for one elo boost.

That is so fucked

Azmoran2 votes

http://www.ausa.org/publications/ausanews/specialreports/2010/8/Pages/DLI%E2%80%99slanguageguidelines.aspx

It's not in that link, but DLI considers English to be a Category 5 language. So ya, it's one of the hardest to learn.

Linthe2 votes

Holy *&^%. Talk about a hijacked thread. Just delete this sad POS.

air tiger1 votes

Hello! I'm wood5, and I'd like to know what Elo boosting is.

FirexSaber5 votes

Elo boosting is when someone who is better at the game than you are plays on your account to get your ranking up to a higher level. For example, a Diamond player playing on the account of someone in Bronze until they hit Platinum.

air tiger1 votes

{quoted}

Elo boosting is when someone who is better at the game than you are plays on your account to get your ranking up to a higher level. For example, a Diamond player playing on the account of someone in Bronze until they hit Platinum.

Thx m8!

Br4ndon1 votes

source?

Bronzoid1 votes

"I didn't know rape was illegal"

ponkzy1 votes

sounds like every athlete that gets caught with PED's.

"Sorry I didn't know that needle that I stuck in my ass contained illegal substances"

Stars Shaper1 votes

Could've gone with "Sorry.. I thought this was still America"

More from Esports

More by Colgate Gator