Skip to content

"If I lose to Dyrus in lane, I will retire" -GV Hauntzer

SuperJediNinja··36 votes·10,201 views

item 3070 RIP

14 Comments

Lucky Moniker10 votes

I came to the boards simply to find this thread. +1 good sir

SuperJediNinja1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Lucky Moniker,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=K3KTPh7v,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-08-10T02:28:05.129+0000)

I came to the boards simply to find this thread. +1 good sir

(ツ)7

Seas0ned1 votes

same

Tails Doll3 votes

Dyrus BM was real tho.

PoisonedTea2 votes

He didn't lose TSM avoided the fight with lane swaps.

jakethesnake10w2 votes

Did you see the final game?

1011001110002 votes

Bunny should not eat carrots.

:^)

S2C2Xd9KOy2 votes

BASICALLY BJERGSEN AND A BUNCH OF WARDS LOOOOL

Gunslinger7442 votes

When Dyrus isn't playing Lulu he's a good player and a serious boon to TSM. When Dyrus is playing Lulu I just have to bury my face into my hands and weep.

TenSlashTen1 votes

Is this how you kids trash talk now a days?

junglerboy161 votes

This is the point in the season where we all sit back and ask TSM "Why the F### weren't you doing a Dyrus comp earlier?!?"

Shock value is only so good, and pulling out the Dyrus comp to throw Gravity was good, but they'll not get such an easy time if the other teams take these comps into account.

Hiemdol2 votes

Over the past several splits TSM has developed a well earned reputation for a only being able to win if Bjersen can carry. Being able to shift the focus to Dyrus allowing him to become a major threat does more than cheese Gravity. If a team now tried to focus all their attention on Dyrus that would leave Bjersen and Wildturtle to basically have free reign of the map, and both players have shown an ability to step up in playoff situations. Similarly this series has shown TSM is willing to let Dyrus play a larger role than 'fend for yourself' so it is likely he can no longer be ignored.

Basically I see this as diversification of threats and better macro game play rather than a shock value attack on Gravity.

PoisonedTea1 votes

{quoted}

Over the past several splits TSM has developed a well earned reputation for a only being able to win if Bjersen can carry. Being able to shift the focus to Dyrus allowing him to become a major threat does more than cheese Gravity. If a team now tried to focus all their attention on Dyrus that would leave Bjersen and Wildturtle to basically have free reign of the map, and both players have shown an ability to step up in playoff situations. Similarly this series has shown TSM is willing to let Dyrus play a larger role than 'fend for yourself' so it is likely he can no longer be ignored.

Basically I see this as diversification of threats and better macro game play rather than a shock value attack on Gravity.

No No No I am impressed in the change of style. If fact this has been a staple of them winning on Lulu mid before then Lulu was banned and wildturle could not carry. In the end TSM has to much weakness in the side lanes they can not carry without bjersen's help. He is carrying them no matter what role he is playing. In contrasted and a different NA team TL. Piglet is a carry and omg can he carry dam superstar adc(NA got some dam good ones and some bad ones). But Ques can also carry(not to the same lvl), and with the support line of the best jungler in NA and an Allstar support it no surprise if they win this whole thing. Clearly TL weakness would be the mid lane but it not all bad.

I think what TSM has done is a major improvement. But it is a bandage fix of the weaknesses in their team. A nice strong one.

More from Esports

More by SuperJediNinja