Why LCK does better and perform better

GhostOfTsushima·2/8/2016, 2:27:03 PM·1 votes·682 views

They take their time allowing all LCK Team to play Bo3 game while LCS only does Bo1

I get tired of explaining crap and no one read anyway but you get the point............

6 Comments

Live2LetDie2/8/2016, 2:55:18 PM1 votes

It's no that they train 16hrs a day, can't have gfs, and get rewarded by having gfs if they win. Couldn't be that

Skilled Theory2/8/2016, 3:47:12 PM1 votes

Well they have small wieners, so they have to get something in return.

Ale non è male2/8/2016, 4:30:03 PM1 votes

[{quoted}](name=WTO HangsterBoi,realm=NA,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=Hr84GXIp,comment-id=,timestamp=2016-02-08T14:27:03.282+0000)

They take their time allowing all LCK Team to play Bo3 game while LCS only does Bo1

Some of the mistakes seen in both LCS regions are not due to lack of play time on scene, though...

iamleburk2/8/2016, 6:28:32 PM1 votes

Next split they are getting rid of Bo1. EULCS is getting Bo2 and NALCS is getting Bo3. They want to try out both of them to see which one is better, both have their benefits. B02 has better logistics in terms of viewership (you always know how many games you're getting), is more balanced because of no side advantages, and it is much more impressive to have a perfect record in Bo2 than Bo3. Bo3 is better for more games, completely erases fluke games, allows for more experimenting and substitutes (because you don't get penalized for dropping a game), and the lack of ties makes it easier to settle play off placement (no need for tiebreakers like in Bo1 or Bo2).