The probleme is about how we dismiss quality content too easily, if we slightly disagree

Glory97·2/20/2018, 6:00:00 PM·3 votes·4,008 views

Board User A: (thinks that the biggest issue is duskbalde) Doesn't upvote (maybe even downvote) high quality post discussing and analyzing how crit-adcs and support itemisation are the biggest issue in the game. Board User B: (thinks that adc+supp is too strong): Doesn't upvote (even downvotes) a high quality post that argues about duskblade being too strong, because if duskblade was nerfed adc+supp would be even stronger.

The opinion that both of them share ends up on the front page of our boards: post C "Balance is out of the window lololol"

I suggest that we all should be more generously upvoting high quality discussions, that we engage in, even if we don't really share the opinion of the post.

2 Comments

ModThe Djinn2/20/2018, 6:44:40 PM1 votes

{quoted}I suggest that we all should be more generously upvoting high quality discussions, that we engage in, even if we don't really share the opinion of the post.

Abso-fucking-lutely. +1.

koshkyra3/20/2018, 2:41:01 AM1 votes

This is why i stopped putting effort into stuff i post, and im not going to deny that my posts are garbage (and by garbage i dont mean they're wrong, just low-quality and little effort)

Because high-quality, thought-out, in depth and well-written posts get shit on meanwhile "lul janna shields her ADC for 3 health bars" is basically catnip for the boards.