Skip to content

It really is sad how easily posts get to the front page for the wrong reasons

Kairoptra··59 votes·6,233 views

You have all these circle-jerks and satirical posts that go nowhere in terms of conversation that completely drown out the ones that want to have a discussion.

I see posts that (to me) make no sense in what they’re trying to say, but get upvoted anyway while people will come up with well thought-out responses and just get downvoted to hell. If you disagree, don’t be afraid to say why; that’s what the Boards are for. The point is to try to come to a mutual understanding. That doesn’t need to be an argument; the common term here is “discussion”.

With the recent changes, I see a lot of potential for actual discussion, but people are acting like we need to rise up against evil Rito. They sound less like protesters and more like children who have been given sub-par toys. In the end, you guys don’t need to get so mad about it. It’s just a game. I understand if you’re coming off of a bad game and you’re already frustrated, but if you just decide to post something hateful because the mood strikes you, that really says more about you than it does Riot.

I don’t know what the solution is or even if there is one. But that’s a big part of the Boards: seeing what you guys think. I would be a hypocrite if I didn’t try to get you guys involved. Please post your thoughts in the comments below.

51 Comments

Anastaecia13 votes

"New"

I never order the forums by "Hot". It's kinda like not muting the troll in game.

Jo0o7 votes

I tend to bounce around. Sometimes its easy to miss a good thread when you only view "new".

Iffy Jarl1 votes

{quoted}

"New"

I never order the forums by "Hot". It's kinda like not muting the troll in game.

kinda the opposite if you think about it heh

notice me Sin pi1 votes

how did i never ever think of that im so dumb

Marshbouy8 votes

I get spam downvoted and drowned out for just saying that, barring a few exceptions, I like the current state of the game. People don't want discussion, they just want to circlejerk about how OP damage is right now, how busted tanks are, how busted adcs are, and complain about things that happened in their games with 0 context.

If you ask for cs/items/a replay on a post where someone is complaining about getting blown up by an enemy, you'll get downvoted and rarely get a reply.

It's really sad honestly.

Disembark2 votes

Yeah, its like asking for a replay is wrong... When someone says something egregious

I usually ask for a replay or any proof

>I got matched with silver 2 when I'm Gold 1?? >>Link to match? >Look at this game Imaqtpie got matched with a D2 player, this proves it! >>Yeah but it only happens in challenger because not enough players.. >>>It happens all the time to me and im gold! > Link to match?

Cycle continues..

Or

>0/6 Kayn 1-shot me wtf?!? >>Replay? >>>It happens all the time idiot downvoted

In the end its always the same: no proof for anything.

Marshbouy2 votes

I know the kayn game that you were talking about and somehow the dude ended like 21/16, so clearly he wasn't doing that terribly. I never ended up getting a replay for it either.

I think people just really dislike dissenting opinions or people who don't instantly side with them so they just downvote automatically.

Flameglow8 votes

There is a solution. We as board users have to take reponsibility. We need to downvote every single post that doesn't promote a constructive conversation. And yes maybe you think that zoe is op and needs to be nerfed hard, but nevertheless you should just downvote a post that just goes along the line of "Zoe is op", without any further explanation. All these posts on the frontpage have like 100 upvotes and 2k views. 95% of the board user neither upvote nor downvote. And this needs to change! Just straight up downvote every post that is unconstructive, even if you share the unconstructive opinion.

ModThe Djinn7 votes

{quoted}I don't know what the solution is or even if there is one.

To some extent, this is a well-documented effect on the internet. There's a reason the most commonly linked news articles tend to have attention-grabbing headlines and, at most, cursory dives into content. It's far easier to get someone to read/comment on a controversial or quick opinion, and it's easy for people -- especially those frustrated by what they see as inaction on their concerns -- to dismiss a longer critique or analysis. There's also a secondary documented effect that shows that opinions that differ from our own and offer facts to support things we find an anathema to our beliefs actually tend to make us feel attacked, and make us less likely to engage in reasonable debate and be open to changing our opinions.

Additionally, a discussion is often harder to have upvoted, because people may disagree with your thoughts/opinions/direction. Saying "Zoe is OP" gets a ton of upvotes because tons of people agree. Saying "Zoe is OP, here's an analysis on why, and here's some suggestions" gets less because it's more reading, and a lot of people will not agree with your specific analysis and downvote you. I kind of tested this the other day on Gameplay -- a 3-paragraph post with a crit replacement proposal got a lot more attention than a 10+ page analysis of several possible crit replacement models and the pros/cons of each, for example. Mainly because the former is easier to digest, and easier to render an easy "yes/no" judgement on.

Personally, I think people need to start upvoting well-presented ideas and discussions, even when they disagree with them. But getting that to happen is hard.

There's also been some debate among our moderation team on whether or not a more curated discussion subboard might be valuable, but it's a LOT of work to maintain, so I can't say it's more than a vague idea right now.

InTheory1 votes

This sooo much.

Personally, I think people need to start upvoting well-presented ideas and discussions, even when they disagree with them. But getting that to happen is hard.

This is literally impossible on the gameplay boards because players here don't come to go into discussion. These are frustrated people that just want - or even just NEED - to vent their anger.

There's also been some debate among our moderation team on whether or not a more curated discussion subboard might be valuable, but it's a LOT of work to maintain, so I can't say it's more than a vague idea right now.

THIS is the best idea ever. I had huge problems publishing my posts because they went unnoticed even at rush hours because they were just too long to read. If that new subboard was a thing, I'd actualy re-upload most of my gameplay discussions from a year or two (of course after updating them).

This post for example got like 24 clicks within 4 rush hours without comments while a post like "If bot wins, I win. If bot loses, I lose" gets literally thousands of clicks.

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}This is literally impossible on the gameplay boards because players here don't come to go into discussion. These are frustrated people that just want - or even just NEED - to vent their anger.

While a bit of an over-exaggeration, this is definitely true. It's hard to really split those who do want discussion from those who do not, or, even within that, those who want to discuss THEIR concerns/opinions from THEIR perspective from those who just want a discussion with less specific results.

THIS is the best idea ever.

It sounds like it, but it's also troublesome for us as a moderation team, as we need to come up with a good way to review posts prior to posting, find the manpower to actually DO that, explain to people on this board why their post wasn't selected, and THEN vet all responses carefully to make sure that the board is living up to its intended purpose. It's a really big undertaking, and may simply not be feasible.

InTheory1 votes

Do you get (potentially) support from Reds if you were to try out something like that?

ModThe Djinn2 votes

{quoted}

Do you get (potentially) support from Reds if you were to try out something like that?

Board support for a volunteer team idea like that is not high on Riot development's priority, as far as I know.

Doctor Dyment1 votes

If such a Board were to be made you would probably have to increase your ranks in the moderation team to keep it under control. I don't know how many of you there are but it if you are thinking preemptively that you might be stretched thin for such a task it would probably be a good idea. If need be they could also only be moderators for that one Board, but I don't know I'm just thinking out loud.

ModThe Djinn1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Doctor Dyment,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=NsYMALe3,comment-id=0005000000000001,timestamp=2018-02-19T20:25:36.005+0000)If such a Board were to be made you would probably have to increase your ranks in the moderation team to keep it under control.

Likely, yes. Or just accept that it would have only a few threads going at a time. We could make moderation easier by more heavily restricting the number of topics.

If need be they could also only be moderators for that one Board...

I'm not personally a huge fan of that, as I prefer it when our team is comfortable with and able to help out the entire community.

D2Vincent1 votes

This actually gives me an idea. What if a new board was created specifically for Venting out frustrations with the game? This way, we can have the Gameplay boards be more for insightful discussion about certain Gameplay aspects, whereas the Vent Boards can be used for people who want or NEED to vent out all their frustrations of the game, or just life in general (maybe think similar to one of those Anger rooms where ppl just smash stuff lol).

And as a suggestion, we could even give the vent boards the Apt name of Magma Chamber. (now let's see who gets the reference here) [slayer-jinx-wink]

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}

This actually gives me an idea. What if a new board was created specifically for Venting out frustrations with the game? This way, we can have the Gameplay boards be more for insightful discussion about certain Gameplay aspects, whereas the Vent Boards can be used for people who want or NEED to vent out all their frustrations of the game, or just life in general (maybe think similar to one of those Anger rooms where ppl just smash stuff lol).

And as a suggestion, we could even give the vent boards the Apt name of Magma Chamber. (now let's see who gets the reference here) [slayer-jinx-wink]

Amusingly, this suggestion has been tossed back and forth for a while amongst the volunteers. No promises of any kind, but the idea is on our radar!

Leaf on Bush1 votes

This would work if those players wouldn't take themselves too serious and if they were aware of the fact that their posts are rants, unprodutive and too subjective.

I don't think that's the case. They would post in gameplay anyway.

Ifneth2 votes

The problem, as another poster has said, boils down to people coming to the boards to vent.

The boards and their moderators admirably want to protect even noxious free speech, but they should understand that this forum was established with the purpose of productive and reasonable discussion. Threads and posts not serving those purposes have little place here.

More than creating a little curated sub-board, we should broadly require that posters strive to achieve the above. With this requirement in place, the moderation staff could look past the details of poster conduct and judge whether it was even intended to foster the environment we want.

To this end, moderators could also review the first few posts of every new poster, keeping individuals from being banned for breaking the rules and then making new accounts to keep posting. It would be worth the trouble.

What do you think, Djinn?

InTheory1 votes

+1 [sg-soraka]

Ifneth1 votes

Awww, thanks! :)

ModThe Djinn1 votes

{quoted}The boards and their moderators admirably want to protect even noxious free speech, but they should understand that this forum was established with the purpose of productive and reasonable discussion. Threads and posts not serving those purposes have little place here.

More than creating a little curated sub-board, we should broadly require that posters strive to achieve the above. With this requirement in place, the moderation staff could look past the details of poster conduct and judge whether it was even intended to foster the environment we want.

To this end, moderators could also review the first few posts of every new poster, keeping individuals from being banned for breaking the rules and then making new accounts to keep posting. It would be worth the trouble.

What do you think, Djinn?

I have a few thoughts on this.

First off, it's literally impossible to manually review the first few posts of every new poster (or that much content in general), and it will 100% not be worth the trouble. New accounts are easy to make, first posts are not necessarily indicative of posting behavior in conflict situations or posting behavior when frustrated, and, frankly, that uses up WAY too much moderator time. Maybe if we were a team of paid employees, but we're all volunteers, many of us with full-time jobs, families, or college classes.

Secondly, while I know it can be frustrating to see people vent, these boards are not, in my view, solely for productive or reasonable discussion. They are for community use, and, while I'd personally like there to be more reasonable discussion, I don't want to lock the community out of a way to express frustration, toss some memes around, or comment on how much they're sick of their bot lane feeding.

It's really simply not feasible to curate that much content, frankly. I know that's not a fun answer, but we'd need about a twenty-fold increase in the volunteer team, and even THEN we'd miss things, because this level of curation would require us to, effectively, read everything posted to the boards.

Ifneth1 votes

Ah, I see. You guys have thought about this. So, what if it were limited to the first few original posts, at least in Gameplay? We don’t get as many of those as posts throughout the forum.

As for memes, there’s a sub-forum. And though I appreciate that having a place to commiserate is important (e.g., the AP Assassin Galio meme threads) not every way of expressing frustration is good for the community. Rage-threads meant to shut out disagreement while drawing attention and validation are something that I hope you agree we could do without.

Iffy Jarl5 votes

Title: "Why does Riot hate me"

Body: Because they only care about money huey huey huey

Front page**

FCJAAAAGOOOO3 votes

Implying the game is going somewhere that ISN'T downhill

Kairoptra7 votes

I never said that. I’m say that the discussion had about balance isn’t productive. This post is about the state of the Boards; not the game.

FCJAAAAGOOOO1 votes

Can't wait for the game to die so there's no boards left

Jo0o2 votes

That's why I tend to steer clear of discussions related to balance. With so many different skill levels, individual players' experiences are often insignificant to a larger discussion about the balance of the game, making threads a confused mess. You can't make an informational post about, say, Yasuo without 90% of your upvotes or downvotes stemming from players opinions on the champ, or opinions on threads about the champ, rather than the actual content of the thread you've made.

And yeah, I'd much rather somebody respond with why they disagree than simply silently downvote.

rework trundle2 votes

I'd much rather somebody respond with why they disagree than simply silently downvote.

Thank you. I hate downvotes. It's such an easy and lame way of saying fuck you without providing a logical explanation.

Jo0o2 votes

... But at the same time, I've seen enough monumentally stupid posts on these boards that are desperately asking to be downvoted into oblivion, that I wouldn't be comfortable with the functionality being removed.

Forcing people to click a thread before downvoting it is good, though.

rework trundle1 votes

Good point. I won't hesitate to downvote a post insulting Riot's apparently shit instant feedback system because they've been banned for saying "kys".

On the other hand, I feel bad for Rubick who is being downvoted for speaking his mind, biased towards juggernauts' state in high elo.

Fairyfleur2 votes

Agree completely. A lot of front-page posts don’t incite any discussion besides “THE GAME IS GARBAGE!!!!”, which ends up taking a lot of room that could go to more well-thought out posts.

Troll for Trump2 votes

A discussion you don't want to hear is still a discussion

Leaf on Bush2 votes

If you are late to work at Riot games, they probably force you to search the boards for well presented ideas... you know as a punishment....

ˉˉˉˉˉˉ1 votes

I generally try to avoid the circlejerk ADC etc. stuff, since all that is well-known and obvious by now. I'd rather get some discussion going on the not-so-popular topics...

General Esdeath 1 votes

like the economy of France

Ren Amari1 votes

This game never cared about the player base. It was always, "Buy more rp dumbass" From riot. And that's how it still is, just uninstall. Hope an actual competitor for the genre saves it, nothing more.

Kairoptra1 votes

We’re not here to talk about the game; only the discussion about the game.

NocturnalSheild1 votes

There isn’t a SINGLE game developer that actually cares about their player base.

Even excellent developers like CD Project Red care about making money MORE then they care about the players (they just realized being good to the players actually makes money)

Saibbo1 votes

You're actually completely wrong.. Game developers like any other artist of any kind really, really care about the opinions and feedback about what they have created because they spent a lot of time for people to enjoy it!

The fact that you may think that they don't care because they don't change what you think is wrong or is actually wrong, is because this is not an indie company with couple thousand of players and they can change the code whenever they feel like it, every change they make affects million of players and needs a really long thought decisions to be made before changing anything.

Ofc money are needed for the company to pay the people that work there and for the servers maintenance. Would you work free hours per day in a game company because otherwise people would think that you're in for the money? Sure, the owners of the game prob couldn't care less and just want to become rich but it's the people that work there that makes the game.

Blåbæret1 votes

{quoted}

It really is sad how easily posts get to the front page for the wrong reasons

You mean like this thread which you just created?

Plenty of discussion happening on the boards - you have to be blind not to see it.

Kairoptra3 votes

The only thing blinding me is the amount of circlejerks and satire. I know that there is discussion, but far too little of it.

Osiris2121 votes

If you really want discussions the reddit page is the place to go.

General Esdeath 1 votes

Nice meme. It's literally just stream highlights, memes, cosplay, fanart, and talking about LCS players.

General Esdeath 1 votes

I mean, most of these points have been discussed before and it leads to nothing. At this point we're just looking for Riot to see these messages.

Skins Project1 votes

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/17/opinion/sunday/liberal-conservative-divide.html?emc=edit_nk_20180216&nl=nickkristof&nlid=74285142&te=1

"Decades ago, a media thinker named Nicholas Negroponte predicted that the Internet would bring a news product he called “The Daily Me,” and it has arrived. We now have the ability to seek out news that perfectly reinforces our own prejudices and helpfully points out how awful the other side is."

T4underbolt1 votes

You don't understand. Because of people like you who are always there to buy rp and support riot, they don't give a flying fk about game balance and it's state and only aim their changes to make more money.

What they do is giving people sht product. Free or not you should not forget about your clients for the good of other clients who are easier to convince you buy rp. For riot it easier to give casuals and baddies freelo champs that require 0 skill and they get to climb, than actually balance the game like veteran players want, because it takes too much time for them and game has been put through too much sht to undo all that fast.

Kairoptra1 votes

Sorry, but I'm afraid you're the one who doesn't understand. This post doesn't say a word about balance. It's about the sorry excuses for discussion had about balance.

Leaf on Bush1 votes

Maybe you actually should elaborate what " true discussion" means for you. I can see a fundamental misconception.

Apparently a lot of people think discussing means to tell your opinion once, without explaining anything. At least that's what I see everywhere. They make a statement, they skip the discussion and they either agree or jump straight to offending each other in an attempt to soil their reputation. It's just a dirty battle without any objectivity.

More from Discuss the Boards

More by Kairoptra