BoRK vs Hydra on Zed
I understand the perks for both, but given that I already have brutalizer, would it bad for me to rush a Tiamat over a Cutlass?
I understand the perks for both, but given that I already have brutalizer, would it bad for me to rush a Tiamat over a Cutlass?
If you're bad at landing skill shots and want chasing potential, go botrk. The active slow makes it harder for them to dodge and you're able to stick on them if they run away
If you want more waveclear go tiamat so you don't have to waste your energy to waveclear making you vulnerable to ganks
Botrk outshines Hydra IMO, the sticking power alone gives more auto attacks to stack dmg on Zeds ultimate. And I'm pretty sure the activation on Botrk also applies to Zed's Ultimate, can someone confirm that?
Look, it really depends on playstyle. Botrk is better for creating picks, sticking to targets and doing 1-hit executions to people below 50% HP. It's passive stacks with yours and with some armor pen you can make quick execution you otherwise wouldn't. Also, it helps with the tanks. Also, the active makes it easy to make plays even with low hp because of the heal it provides. Hydra gives you a lot of waveclear and a free AA damage with the active when you are point blank but you have no chasing potential. Also, you gain 50 more AD that will make all your spells hurt more. So, try them both and choose depending on your playstyle.