Thanks.
I'll just be dumping some stuff that cam to mind (and words, words are also important when writing).
One of the things that continues to strike me as they seek to divorce the story of Runeterra from the game it relies on to even exist. Is that it's not really "Lore" any more, because it doesn't have any bearing on the game, since the game doesn't to any extent express the story, and, in my opinion worse, that the story doesn't any longer express it's connection to the game.
Lore, for a video game, is an extension of the story told within the medium, it's all the small tidbits that you can't properly express in the game itself, but which lends context for the story of the game.
The current "Lore" does not exist in a capacity which supports the game at all, since the champions no longer have their motivations or struggles imposed on the game itself, since the game no longer helps drive the story.
Simplified, I think it's false advertising to call what ever they make now 'League of Legends' Lore' when the story and the game doesn't interact. I no longer gain more context for any of the things in the game by reading/watching/listening/whatever the new fictional material, because explicitly, the game itself is no longer canon.
To that end I don't know why they haven't simplified it to "We don't have a story for our game anymore" and just left the story aspect of everything behind. (Actually I do know, it's because they know the game will sell more if the characters portrayed in it have some sort of narrative attached)
'Game Lore' is something you have when you have external material explaining details about your game world.
But the new stance is that the game world doesn't exist.
As such, if they're gonna retcon out the game, they'd better stop calling it lore, because it's a false claim.