If this keeps up...
... LoL will soon lose in terms of Lore to HotS. Losing to nothing... kinda sad if you ask me... NARRATIVE GET UP YOUR ASS! I once played this game for the lore...
... LoL will soon lose in terms of Lore to HotS. Losing to nothing... kinda sad if you ask me... NARRATIVE GET UP YOUR ASS! I once played this game for the lore...
I'm sorry? HotS has 3 FRANCHISES worth of lore. Diablo, Starcraft, Warcraft, it has metric shit tonnes of it to draw from. Warcraft has 4 games, each having its own expansions, Starcraft has 2 games with multiple expansions, Diablo has 3 games with multiple expansions. All those series also have books, comics and other forms of story outside of the games.
You're asking narrative how they're losing to that?
And what do they do in HotS ITSELF? Inside the game nothing is done, they just take from other games in the franchises. Lore & Art representation: hell, not even a splash art.
Also some characters are... I'm not sure, but for example Azmodan, even with taking all Diablo lore... seems pretty replaceable to me. "Hurr Durr True Ruler of Hell! Hurr Durr EVIL!".
They have a few fleshed out characters, protagonosts form other games (or main atagonists), but the rest is kinda... well... let's take Srgnt. Hammer for example. It's a siege tank. Wow. That's all xD
Hey, leave Bama alone. It's hard enough work to pick murloc guts out of threads after every match that pits her against Murky, now you want to add complicated narrative experiences to her schedule.
They don't need to do shit in HotS itself, because they have the 3 franchises to build up their lore. They've been doing it for over a decade! They have books, comics and games galore to embellish their lore and have been doing so for closing in on 20 years for some of these franchises.
You're comparing two things that are distinctly different: League is one game, the lore is for that specific game, that's it. HotS is an amalgamation of four (likely five when Overwatch gets released) franchises, with all four being twice as old as League. Comparing lore between them is pretty much nonsensical in my book.
I'm sorry? HotS has 3 FRANCHISES worth of lore. Diablo, Starcraft, Warcraft, it has metric shit tonnes of it to draw from. Warcraft has 4 games, each having its own expansions, Starcraft has 2 games with multiple expansions, Diablo has 3 games with multiple expansions. All those series also have books, comics and other forms of story outside of the games.
You're asking narrative how they're losing to that?
Thank you, lol. Perfect response.
HotS isn't starting from the ground up. There's already well established lore to pull from.
Have you seen HoTS? Its a moba with practically no gameplay, a game that boring will never compete with LoL or even Dota.
HOTS got itself a 2-hour slot on ESPN and while the viewership ratings were low, they were higher than expected and there are expectations of more tournaments getting shown.
So no, far as comparisons between it and League go, HotS already won.
[{quoted}](name=DG Ashabel,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=b7BzKqtu,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2015-05-10T13:15:54.606+0000)
HOTS got itself a 2-hour slot on ESPN and while the viewership ratings were low, they were higher than expected and there are expectations of more tournaments getting shown.
So no, far as comparisons between it and League go, HotS already won.
HOTS is from Blizzard, and Blizzard is know for making good quality games that the fans like. What did Riot make, one game, and that game is only pleasing more than a third of its player base. As you said HOTS already won, because it is Blizzard. The name of the company alone can influence people and their decisions.
When was espn a metric of success? Lots of weird shit get played on iys other channels. Even LoL was on espn at one point.
HoTS allready won? Won what exactly? It has objectivly only a fraction of LoL's playerbase and viewership. All HoTS won is maybe 4th most popular moba. At this moment, League is king and your blind fanboyism wont change that.
Did you really needed to accuse me of blind fanboyism because I pointed out that League already lost the major achievement of being the first eSport aired on a major sports network to HOTS?
Do I need to explain how laughably embarrassing it is to accuse someone of blind fanboyism when you're the one who starts slinging insults when someone points out that their favorite game isn't doing nearly as bad as it should be doing with its age and playerbase? Would I also need to explain to you that I wouldn't be hanging out on League forums instead of HOTS ones if I was a HOTS fan first, or is that too logical for your fanatical mudslinging?
Your neglect of details nor information seems to not be the issue here.
No, you clearly are suffering from some internal emotional struggle and I would recommend that you stay away from any form of debate until you are more capable of mind.
On my side, I would recommend that you educate yourself in the meaning of words before employing them. This would be a debate if we exchanged information, but so far all you've done is providing strings of embarrassingly hamhanded insults.
Lolz, no. I disagreed with you and you started bawling on the ground flinging insults. I have no desire to argue with people like that.
Hmmm, let's look at our first two posts.
HOTS got itself a 2-hour slot on ESPN and while the viewership ratings were low, they were higher than expected and there are expectations of more tournaments getting shown.
So no, far as comparisons between it and League go, HotS already won.
Oh look, no personal reference to you at all.
When was espn a metric of success? Lots of weird shit get played on iys other channels. Even LoL was on espn at one point.
HoTS allready won? Won what exactly? It has objectivly only a fraction of LoL's playerbase and viewership. All HoTS won is maybe 4th most popular moba. At this moment, League is king and your blind fanboyism wont change that.
Oh look, a personal insult.
But given that you couldn't even maintain your line of argument between your first and second posts, I don't blame you for erasing your shitty behavior from your memory in an effort to make yourself look good in your own head.
Do I need to explain how laughably embarrassing it is to accuse someone of blind fanboyism when you're the one who starts slinging insults when someone points out that their favorite game isn't doing nearly as bad as it should be doing with its age and playerbase? Would I also need to explain to you that I wouldn't be hanging out on League forums instead of HOTS ones if I was a HOTS fan first, or is that too logical for your fanatical mudslinging?
Oh look, a paragraph of pointless insults. So just wtf are you talking about? I have not been inconsistant within myself, YOU are the one slinging rampant insults and blaming others for it.
I'll say it again. HotS has only a fraction of LoL's player/viewer base. You may disagree - so be it. Riot is not a God-tier company but Blizzard has done nothing but disapoint in the last few years. I have zero faith Blizzard will do the right thing to turn HotS around and even with their near limitless resources, they'll let the HotS ship sink eventually. These are my predictions. You are free to disagree. So be it.
In before your emotional outbursts of insult flinging and hypocritical logic, we are done here.
From...
Have you seen HoTS? Its a moba with practically no gameplay, a game that boring will never compete with LoL or even Dota.
To...
When was espn a metric of success? Lots of weird shit get played on iys other channels. Even LoL was on espn at one point.
HoTS allready won? Won what exactly?
From "HOTS cannot compete with LOL" to "LOL doesn't need to compete with HOTS," sure is inconsistency within your logical process. Very much fits with trying to claim that my abrasive response to your insults somehow makes you a victim.
Granted, not like there were any insults in my paragraph. Pointing out that your attempts to insult me are embarrassing, illogical and contribute nothing to an argument isn't an insult unless you are self-absorbed enough to think people you talk to will tolerate your bad manners.
Pardon if I don't consider predictions of a patronizing self-absorbed manchild with a victim complex to be worth much of anything, especially since your analysis of how Blizzard handles things runs contrary to their entire business model.
Haha, are you a joke? Are you a typical forum troll looking for attention? Your replies are so off the wall I often feel you are arguing with someone else entirely.
I did say "HOTS cannot compete with LOL" but when did I say "LOL doesn't need to compete with HOTS,"? Perhaps if that statement meant HoTS is so insignificant in the MOBA scene that LoL doesnt have to compete with them, sure you can confer that and I wouldnt mind. If it means that LoL "doesnt needs to compete because it just surrenders to HotS because Blizzard Huge! or its a different genre alltogether" would make my logic inconsistent - But I never once said anything to that train of thought. So where did you conjure this?
Minus the "Blind Fanboyism" where have I been insulting? You literally cannot go two sentences without slobbering an insult of one kind or another. Unless you see my view of current Blizzard of not being 'All Mighty' as being 'Bad Mannered'? I [One] apologize for having opinions from past experiences [Two] where else would you fabricate me being 'Bad Mannered' from?
I do find your replies entertaining though, how you get so heated up fighting phantoms. Oh oh, maybe I'll say something racist this time! Or maybe we'll get more of your tried and true string of insults saying Non-Hypocritically how insulting I have been! Or the mystery of where you will take my straight forward replies on a magical journey to transcend them into something else entirely.
I do anxiously await for your reply. :D
You have now spent like, a week trying to accuse me of attacking you when all I've done is respond abrasively to your insult. The very insult that you're now trying to pass off as something that didn't deserve an abrasive response, which very nicely defines your intellectual worth and social competence.
That's pretty much the entire response you get. Feel free to try again when you develop a personality that doesn't begin and end with juvenile insults and a persecution complex.
This is actually too funny, I know what is going on now! Its great!
To recap: My last several comments have practically been "What are you even talking about??"
then of course you'd say stuff like I have a 'persecution complex' and im a 'patronizing self-absorbed manchild'.
Then i'd say "Why you being insulting and what are you even talking about??"
And then it clicked on me, for some reason - some how - you are reading your own messages to me and then replying back to your own messages as if I said them!
Fascinating, absolutely out of this world. I love it!
No, your last several comments have been the most embarrassingly awkward attempts to deflect blame for your own shitty behavior onto someone else while also trying to insult them.
You have a persecution complex because you somehow feel that someone responding to your insult by insulting you back means they've attacked you first.
You're patronizing because because you think shoving a deflective insult into your comment somehow gives it enough argumentative value for you to belittle the other person.
You're self-absorbed because you don't even have enough the basic capacity for self-reflection that would let you consider that your presentation of your arguments has crippled your ability to be taken seriously, as well as because you think you insulting other people is fine and justified while those people retorting is not.
You're a manchild because you've now spent a week contradicting yourself in a desperate effort to belittle me in hopes that it will somehow make you look better in this conversation. Any person with the faintest hint of maturity would realize that pigheaded rudeness only makes them look embarrassing.
Again, develop an actual personality sometime. Contradicting yourself within two sentences and then trying to arrogantly put down the other person when called out on it is the ultimate stereotype of a college freshman.
Also consider what it says about your personality when a casual internet debate with you causes the person lose interest in discussing other matters with you and simply spend several comments telling you that you behave like you got your social skills from a garbage dumpster.
Dude, just let it go. We all know Blizzard is better and manages to do better than Riot at this time. Its not someone being a fanboy, its just facts.
Your neglect of details nor information seems to not be the issue here.
No, you clearly are suffering from some internal emotional struggle and I would recommend that you stay away from any form of debate until you are more capable of mind.
Im more of a LoL player than any other Blizzard (insert game here) player and Im not "a fan" of Blizzard per say, didnt even play much of their games, but I do think that Blizzard knows how to make games properly. I mean come one, numbers alone dont make a game (even though Wow revolutionized gaming as a whole but I digress), its the quality of the game as well and right now, Blizzard is better than Riot, without question. What he said is perfectly justified. Cause they have the money, the decades built reputation and the enormous talent working for them.
Ah, this makes sense why you see Blizzard differently than me. Back in the day, I was super huge into Blizzard games. I played the crap outa Sc1, D2, D1, Warcraft 2 and Warcraft 3. So after Blizzard took its 10(?) year hiatus after WoW's release, imagine my excitement when Blizzard announces Starcraft 2 in 2010. Maybe I just grew away from RTS's because the game play of SC2 felt the same as SC1 but I just didnt feel it. What hit me the hardest was the single player campaign, SC1 to this day has one of my favorite story lines of any video game. Fantastic character building, awesome universe, Arcturus Mengsk was one of my favorite villains. Come in SC2, the story line was atrocious. Why does Raynor have this serious boner for Kerrigan all of a sudden? This 'forbidden love' was shoe horned in (For absolutely zero good reasons) and became 90% of the plot. Arcturus Mengsk who was once this charismatic and intelligent villain (which imo, is one of the best villains of any medium) is now a bumbling saturday cartoon buffoon of a villain. To say I was disappointed in Blizzard would be appropriate.
Then in 2011 comes the announcement of Diablo 3, me and my friend would play D2 in lan for hours on end and D3 would be the fix we needed! At the time I was going to college and couldnt (should'nt) have afforded the game at release - But whats eating less when compared to playing D3? We've played many and many D2 clones but they never scratched that itch. Excitedly we fire up the game and.. we'll the rest is history. D3 was notorious for its horrendous reception at launch. Just everything about its gameplay wasnt right or just plain bad.
I do play hearthstone about once a week, it is a decent game. A placebo to my MTG addiction of years past.
I agree with your statement - if you put it in the past tense. Blizzard [was] better than Riot [in its prime], without question. Blizzard has had a decade of reputation and cache built up from its golden age. Without question they have the talent and resources. Can blizzard make a great game? I have yet still to see. Riot on the other hand (with the exception of its lore - which is beyond fail at this point) has a very solid game.
And about the forum troll, I apologize. Sometimes when I walk by a fence and see a dog barking and slobbering like a feral dog on rabies, soooometimes I like to slap the fence to provoke it into a wild fury. Not a great quality, I realize but doesnt make it any less fun. :3
Yuss, the first downvote xD Keep it up guys ^^
Nah, I just tried some heroes of the storm... and in terms of lore I'm massively disappointed from that game. "Here, this is a demon hunter. She loves hutning demons." That's it. Full lore. Sounds awefully familiar in terms of shortness, no? ^^
I see your Valla complaint...
And raise you the following:
http://wow.gamepedia.com/Thrall
Is there really a point to write more than that? Vella is a free unlock for everyone who owns Diablo III and as far as playable character personalities and lore in that game go, her popularity is only second to Azula Li-Ming and Anajinn. She doesn't really need even more lore when she already has a 5-act game, a bunch of side material and another expansion pack in development.
A 5 act game that somehow has 0 individual story apart from right.clicking different kinds of monsters while featuring zero character development... If they would feature that jewlery merchant (I love that guys story) as a hero... at least that guy HAS lore... Meanwhile the Demon hunter is a cardboard character, completly replaceable... Or hell, why not Deckard Cain? Make your enemies stay a while and listen...
Also... strange... I have D3 and I don't have her. She's just in the free rotation right now if I remember correctly
If you really somehow missed piles upon piles of dialogue, narrated cutscenes and banter between Vella and her companions while dungeon-crawling, the problem is likely with you and not the game.