Among all the complains, I just wanna say...
I love what you've done with Evelynn Riot. I can't wait to play her.
I love what you've done with Evelynn Riot. I can't wait to play her.
yeah i agree.. so many stupid kids or people claiming to be female complaining about how sexualized she is but thats just who the champion is shes also alot more like a succubus wich is what i think riots original vision was suppose to be Pain, torment. pleasure
I mean, I not every champion needs to be super sexualized, but Evelynn would probably be super boring if she wasn't. I really like what they did with her model and vo to really push for the succubus feel.
well yes not every champion needs to be super sexualized i agree with that but thats just kinda eves thing and normally riot doesnt so its good to see atleast like 1 champion in the entire game can have it.... kinda like the the widowmaker of overwatch even tho ive never played ow in my life
Exactly my point. A non sexual Eve wouldn't be Eve at all.
yes she would.
Even old Eve was a bit sexual in the way she enjoyed inflicting pain.
yeah i agree.. so many stupid kids or people claiming to be female complaining about how sexualized she is but thats just who the champion is shes also alot more like a succubus wich is what i think riots original vision was suppose to be Pain, torment. pleasure
I'm female and I don't find her sexualized at all lol. she's a killer not a fucker. it's so hilarious how everyone is falling for her charm, not realizing that sex was never on the plate - their tortured death was
[sg-miss-fortune]
I can't wait to play her
Actually Reav3 said as a demon she needs to fulfill certain needs before she can actually kill her victims. Now whether that need is simply their lust or actually doing it with them (I think that's somewhat implied by the nature of her VO and the fact that she's a succubus), we don't really know for sure.
It's actually in her VO. All she requires is a touch with intent. She doesn't have sex with anyone, it's all just a trap. Once you touch her, it's already to late for you.
Does a "touch with intent" imply it can't just be casual touch, like a handshake, it has to be a "let's find somewhere quiet, boo" kind of touch?
"Intent" so probably the latter.
Evelynn, the Consent's Embrace
I know right? I was thinking that was pretty chivalrous for a blood thirsty demon.
To be fair
won't devour whatever is most precious to you if you don't make a deal with him in the first place.
But what if I survive the first lashing? Do my odds go up or?
Depends on whether your Void staff got up or not from it
People are already making theories about 7 deadly sins demons and while you seem to not wanting to confirm anything, theoretically, would these be just inspirations for champions who aren't connected together or is there some kind of origin and plan (possibly connected to Darkin), something that all demons share despite their different origins and intents? And theoretically speaking, is Tahm representing gluttony or greed? And theoretically speaking, are Noc and Shaco demons, too? And theoretically speaking, how many champions from existing one would you plan on demonifying with their VGUs (besides Veigar and Teemo :^) )
Demons do not represent the seven deadly sins. Demons origins are similar but very different than Darkin. I have no idea what Noc or Shaco are and we don't plan out ahead of time what direction we will take our VGUs, the team working on them once they start will figure that out. I can see a lot of different directions you could take Noc and Shaco.
Isn't that so easy for Evelynn to seduce her preys? "Just one touch with desire".
Also does it mean her charm is not magical but more a like real woman? Otherwise, I don't know who can even survive her. One touch with desire easiness + magical, irresistible attraction = certain death gg.
If her charm is not magical, does it mean she can't seduce people who have no interest in women?
The in-game interactions are meant to be gameplay interpretations of her theme, not be taken that literal. She charms people with her looks in the lore, but that doesn't translate well into game so instead she has a charm mechanic. Much like Tham doesn't really have to make actual contracts with people in the game to ear them.
when you guys do the aatrox rework, you should consider packaging it with some new lore for him and darkin in general
But wasn't Nocturne the demon from the demacia story?Doesn't that confirm that he is a demon? Or would you be ready to retcon this lore piece once Nocturne gets a VGU?
Though then again,the demacians might have simply mistaken him for a demon,so I guess this isn't a problem as long as you keep Nocturne as a living nightmare,which is rather unlikely to change.
Correct. The Demacians believed he was a demon but that doesn't mean he actually is, that doesn't mean he isn't either
So he's a mysterious champion with a mysterious history?
That's a very sensible observation, but remember also that with eve's rework, her short story that was released recently-ish isn't canon anymore, so it might well be that that story with Nocturne is made non-canon once Nocturne is given a new lore
Well but Eves short story came out with a note that clarified from the get go,that the story isn't going to remain canon. http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/news/riot-games/editorial/note-shadows-beckon
Oh, tanks, I wasn't aware of that clarification!
Another thing that comes to my mind is that IIRC the "shadow" in Lux' lore was confirmed to be Nocturne by a Rioter, it's never said in the lore. That way, they can change up Nocturne and still have the story canon, with the shadow thing not being Nocturne anymore, but still being what Lux fought in that battle....? (unsure)
But then again, there's actually no reason why Riot shouldn't decide on a case-by-case basis about this kind of stuff, I know it's good to have expectations matching the outcome, but I can think of being happy with the story remaining canon for Nocturne or not, as long as the change makes sense and is developed well ^^
Well a rioter did confirm that the shadow is actually Nocturne,so they'd had to go back on their word,which would also be kinda bad for the trust between the rioters and the fans.
Similar to how Tahm Kench needs to be 'let in.'
Interesting.
So what I'm getting from this is Vayne's parents wanted a threesome.
Maybe it was getting a little stale in bed & they wanted to spice things up ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).
So how do demons reproduce? Or for that matter, do they reproduce?
What about in the case of Vayne hunting Evelynn down? Can Evelynn fight back, or does she just have to flee from someone who is hunting her? Can Evelynn do anything to people that don't touch her with intent?
I would think that 'intent' does not necessarily refer to sexual intentions. So if someone would slap Evelynn in the face that is also a touch with intent. But the intent is to hurt her. And so fullfulling the requirements for Evelynn to show them the proper way to slap someone.
So, she can't do anything or harm the individual until they touch her with intent? Based on what Eve uses, I'm guessing that it is a touch fueled by desire?
If that's right, then...Oh my, that has some interesting implications for Vayne's parents, then.
Yes it does :)
Evelynn can be very...persuasive.
tho reav3 you wouldnt happen to know if riot is fixing tango evelynn would you >.> splash vs ingame model the coloration is so far off
We are making adjustment, yes
On the topic of skins, would you happen to know if there's any discussion with Masquerade Evelynn? I'm sure model changes take quite a bit longer to make than texture changes, but a lot of the people I've heard from have issues with how big her hair is in this skin.
We are looking into that as well
they just don't understand it's to get the attention of Beekeeper Singed.
Is there going to be any response to the outcry about the total removal of AD scaling from evelynn's kit?
[{quoted}](name=i am alyra,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=MVjAEG9W,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2017-09-27T16:30:02.588+0000)
I'm female and I don't find her sexualized at all lol.
Yeah, sure, she is absolutely not sexualized. I REALLY cannot see how people may get that idea. She really gets the killing part across, not the sex part.
But congrats, you showed'em boys you are a cool girl they can like, not an angry SJW.
Yeah, sure, she is absolutely not sexualized. I REALLY cannot see how people may get that idea. She really gets the killing part across, not the sex part.
But congrats, you showed'em boys you are a cool girl they can like, not an angry SJW.
it's cause they read the lines into sex, they are after all classic innuendos. but if you actually pay attention to the rest of the things she says, that's when the killer she really is becomes realized - it's actually kinda exciting :3 totally fantasy of course, actually killing actual people is very unappealing. but for fantasy shit, death is a lovely thing to consume
[sg-jinx]
I'm soo very satisfied with her VO because of how well they use classic sexual innuendo lines to actually mean something else entirely
She's incredibly sexualized. That's the point.