You're right, I wasn't very clear with my statement which ended up being kinda tautologic. What I meant that problematic posts are, according to my observations, exceptional - and high-quality posts are more likely to get votes.
Therefore I require data to speak in favor of OP. Such as X recent new posts we classified as shitty got, on average, more votes than Y posts we classify as high quality and constructive. I think people upvoting statements such as the OP's one are upvoting because at some point of time, they got their valid point against popular opinion downvoted and now feel butthurt.
These complains occur in about 1 day frequency effectively fulfilling the circlejerk definition.