A SOLUTION FOR AFK

xGunna1·Dec 22, 2017·1 votes·1,046 views

if a midlaner afk the system kick the other team's mid laner so it is 4v4 but who get kicked not punished and get small lp for the inconvenience

58 Comments

AlienPrimateDec 22, 20175 votes

There is a major flaw to this idea. Let's say I start off 0/6/0 in top lane and the enemy Fiora who absolutely destroyed me started 8/0/0 with 6 kills on me and 2 on my jungler. She is pretty much guaranteed to win the game, but I decide I want to leave. Now the team score that was 3-12 is now 3-4 because I didn't want to play anymore.

HalcyonDwellerDec 22, 20173 votes

Won't that be really un-fun for the player who gets kicked in order to balance the teams?

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

4v4 is fair 4v5 not fair

HalcyonDwellerDec 22, 20172 votes

Kicking a player from a game is also unfair to that player.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

he didn't lose anything so it is fair for him to play another game but i suggested free small lp for him

HalcyonDwellerDec 22, 20172 votes

What if he was invested in that game. You queue up for a match, you expect to get to play it through to the end. It doesn't seem fair to punish him by taking this away simply for somebody else's AFK.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

what if he get LP based on his kda will it be fair suggestion ?

alasarcherDec 22, 20172 votes

{quoted}

what if he get LP based on his kda will it be fair suggestion ?

You keep talking about LP as if thats only thing that matters. People want to play game.

BarleyDec 22, 20172 votes

Not their fault the enemy afk’d._

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

it is not fair 4v5

NocturnalSheildDec 22, 20172 votes

Life aint fair.

Its 100% unfair though to kick someone for what someone else did.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

he didn't lose anything he got free small lp why would he complain ?

xGunna1Dec 22, 20172 votes

it is funny you said life is not fair to justify 4v5

and in the same time u complain it is not fair to be kicked

contradiction ?

BarleyDec 22, 20172 votes

Its not fair 4v4 either, as the better thing would just be to canvel the game all together in my opinion. No wonder you have so many downvotes. But to be fair, just keep playing and deal with it. Clearly you lost a game because of an afk and came onto boards to complain about how unfair it is that just because one person makes a mistake, you should punish more people.

ModiDec 22, 20172 votes

That would not be fun, especially if you trade roles in champ select. Think about it: top (formerly ADC) leaves. Now enemy team's ADC is booted. Not quite equitable.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

then we add role trade not only champ trade in champ select and the problem solved

ModiDec 23, 20172 votes

Still does not solve the problem of forcibly removing someone from a game. That isn't fair either, and is just as not fair as the team who loses a member.

WeatheredDec 22, 20172 votes

So lets say my team is all high Diamond, but I am a platinum mid laner. The other team has a Masters mid laner, but the rest of them are low Diamond/ high Plat. Time to afk for the free win for my team I guess.

DeathbypieDec 22, 20172 votes

And then the first one comes back! Not to mention the tons of other problems with this terrible idea..

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

he already afk can't get back

Kei143Dec 22, 20172 votes

and what if it was an internet interruption and he'll be back in 3 minutes?

RuFiotDec 22, 20172 votes

It's not always about the win, after you putting 20 min to get fed getting kicked is really a bummer.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

4v5 with fed teams is unfair

Jo0oDec 22, 20172 votes

I've never trolled a day in my life, but implementing this system would make me want to troll SO HARD.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

how is that ? if you constantly afk u will get busted and banned easily than just feeding as a troll

Jo0oDec 22, 20173 votes

Yet folks still do it under the current system. AFKing already ruins games, but giving somebody the power to take another person down with them in a rage-quit is an amazing tool to hand to trolls.

Additionally, prepare to be bullied into voluntarily AFKing any time you fall behind in lane. It serves your team's best interests for you to quit games if you're behind parity. That's incredibly unhealthy for the game.

Plus, the game as a whole would become incredibly unfun if folks are prone to being kicked out not just over their own connectivity, but their opponents' as well. I steamrolled a guy in top lane a few nights ago, and he rage-quit at about 9 minutes. That was annoying to me, but having myself removed from the game at the height of my success would have utterly soured the entire experience for me.

Look, your heart is in the right place, but this idea is extremely flawed and can't possibly work.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

your team win and u lose what did you win ? nothing

Jo0oDec 22, 20172 votes

I don't know what to say. Nobody agrees with you, and everybody is sharing reasons why it couldn't work.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

in solo q u want to climb not to lose lp in favor of your team that has nothing to do with you (removed DUO btw)

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

I don't know what to say. Nobody agrees with you, and everybody is sharing reasons why it couldn't work.

He won't ever concede that his idea isn't well thought out. If you notice the pattern of his posts, all he does is dismiss feedback rather than consider the feedback.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

afkers busted by system

they get banned easily not like stealth troll which are more worst

NegativityDec 22, 20172 votes

This guy always making troll posts lol

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

How about we get the option to vote for the AFK person's character to be controlled like the AIs in intermediate Coop v AI?

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

no bots are bad will feed

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

no bots are bad will feed

You didn't read, you solely saw coop v ai and jumped to your answer. If you actually read instead of just trying to find people who agree with you, you would have seen that there was the option to vote for AI to control, which means if the team says yes, you get a bot. If the team votes no, the person stays in the fountain as an AFK.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

it is a useless feature because bots are bad whether intermediate or beginner so why we give option to add these bots rather than balancing game to 4v4

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

it is a useless feature because bots are bad whether intermediate or beginner so why we give option to add these bots rather than balancing game to 4v4

This is a pointless thread because you only seek people who agree with you and you don't care for any dialogue. You have been completely ignoring every one who has told you that your suggestion is wildly unfair to the person who gets kicked for various reasons, like free LP if their team lost, non equitable boots, the LP compensation actually doesn't work, if the person who got hit by the AFK because of a internet disconnect but then comes back, etc... and that this doesn't actually solve the problem of AFK's but it actually encourages people to try and abuse it by getting the worst performing person to take one for the team and get a loss in hopes the enemy player that is performing well gets booted and thus creating a worse situation because you're creating a situation that encourages turning teammates against one sacrificial lamb.

Also, you failed to see that if the game wasn't ranked, there would be no compensation at all...

Your idea isn't well thought out and you don't even counter arguments with logic, you just say they're bad and dismiss the feedback.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

"encourages people to try and abuse it by getting the worst performing person to take one for the team and get a loss in hopes the enemy player that is performing well gets booted and thus creating a worse situation "

if you AFK YOU LOSE GAME HOW IS THIS ENCOURAGING ? you get - LP

if the skilled player got kicked is the skilled player have the same mmr to enemy team or not ?

1_yes .. then no problem 2_no then we fix the matchmaking system not my idea cuz if a matchmaking system put diamond vs gold then it's the matchmaking system problem not my idea

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

"You didn't read, you solely saw coop v ai and jumped to your answer. If you actually read instead of just trying to find people who agree with you"

you were negative in the first comment so it is ur problem and u need to chill cuz i replied to all comment

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

"encourages people to try and abuse it by getting the worst performing person to take one for the team and get a loss in hopes the enemy player that is performing well gets booted and thus creating a worse situation "

if you AFK YOU LOSE GAME HOW IS THIS ENCOURAGING ? you get - LP

if the skilled player got kicked is the skilled player have the same mmr to enemy team or not ?

1_yes .. then no problem 2_no then we fix the matchmaking system not my idea cuz if a matchmaking system put diamond vs gold then it's the matchmaking system problem not my idea

You don't read and you again somehow think your idea is perfect.

A) The team has 1 option, the AFKer deal with 4 people harassing the fuck out of them and trolling them or AFK and take one for the team. READ THE COMMENTS BEFORE RESPONDING. DON"T JUST READ A WORD AND FLIP OUT THAT SOMEONE DOESN"T AGREE WITH YOU.

B) Again the hubris here in that you think your idea is better than matchmaking and don't even consider the pros and cons of having to reevaluate the matchmaking system and the programming implications vs your simple solution that causes more problems than it solves.

This is the last time I'm going to respond because it's like talking to a wall.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

u were talking negatively from the start i should let u talk with your self

Glu10SensitivityDec 22, 20172 votes

{quoted}

u were talking negatively from the start i should let u talk with your self

srsly? you said the dude's first comment was negative and the first comment is a suggestion. u need a reality check bro. u think ur idea is mensa level but u don't try to talk with anyone, u only try to talk at everyone.

xGunna1Dec 22, 20171 votes

he talked like i didn't understood his opinion in a negative way even though i said the bots will feed even in bronze v cuz they are just bad

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

he talked like i didn't understood his opinion in a negative way even though i said the bots will feed even in bronze v cuz they are just bad

So now you are trying to retcon the discussion. When you talk about how I was negative from the start... The first post was the suggestion that was different from your suggestion and you called that negative... which means you find opinions other than your own negative.

Glu10SensitivityDec 22, 20171 votes

{quoted}

he talked like i didn't understood his opinion in a negative way even though i said the bots will feed even in bronze v cuz they are just bad

u only talked about one aspect and ignored everything else so what do u expect? also, u nvr said anything abt bronze.

YerroFeverDec 22, 20171 votes