Solution for toxic smurfs

scazzman·Mar 27, 2017·1 votes·521 views

double punishment tiers in games below level 30 and punishment decay doesn't happen until you reach level 30 and in games below 30 EVERY report triggers a review by the IFS, and report weight isnt taken into account

5 Comments

Deep Terror NamiMar 27, 20174 votes

Are you trying to keep new players away or smurfs? I can't tell.

scazzmanMar 27, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=Deep Terror Nami,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=v7AsGaNK,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-03-27T00:26:31.154+0000)

Are you trying to keep new players away or smurfs? I can't tell.

both if theyre toxic

ModThe DjinnMar 27, 20172 votes

Well that sounds like a good solution to the Smurf problem, note that it also means new players are subject to more stringent penalties then long time players. I'm not sure that's a good precedent to set.

scazzmanMar 27, 20171 votes

[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=v7AsGaNK,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-03-27T00:26:47.463+0000)

Well that sounds like a good solution to the Smurf problem, note that it also means new players are subject to more stringent penalties then long time players. I'm not sure that's a good precedent to set.

well, the "new players" who would be affected are the ones we don't want coming in anyway, and it also lets them know right off the bat that toxicity wont be tolerated, and eventually, smurfs will be unable to get an account to level 30 without reforming, and permabanned players would take a lot longer to get back into ranked, which would make them more likely to simply quit rather then continue to make new accounts

KirisomiaMar 27, 20171 votes

How does Riot know you're smurfing? If they do, what is the point then? The'll just put you right back to where you are in terms of level. Are you directing your point at new players?