My teammate called us all retards and then ran it down mid

koshkyra··2 votes·408 views

If I dont recieve a report message i am thoroughly dissapointed in this game

25 Comments

redniwediS6 votes

If you don't receive a message from the buggy and unreliable instant feedback system you're going to be disappointed? You should be disappointed, but because of the crappy pop up. That player will get their due rewards, whether the pop up worked for you or not.

Chermorg4 votes

I think it needs made clear that the system isn't unreliable, just the notifications. Although, it's still possibly intended so as to prevent this type of witch hunting that goes on.

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

I think it needs made clear that the system isn't unreliable, just the notifications. Although, it's still possibly intended so as to prevent this type of witch hunting that goes on.

It's not witch hunting if they're actually a witch. so many people don't understand the proper use of the term.

Umbral Regent4 votes

It doesn't matter if they are a witch or not - witch-hunting isn't allowed. Riot doesn't want people rallying for hate against another player for any reason - even if the person being hunted has broken the rules, that doesn't give anyone else the freedom to do so themselves. Two wrongs don't make a right.

gabetheguy1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=scdJ3dzB,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-21T03:08:54.936+0000)

It doesn't matter if they are a witch or not - witch-hunting isn't allowed. Riot doesn't want people rallying for hate against another player for any reason - even if the person being hunted has broken the rules, that doesn't give anyone else the freedom to do so themselves. Two wrongs don't make a right.

I'm fully aware of that. Thing is, so long as proof can be provided, there is nothing wrong with "rallying hate" against these people.

Umbral Regent2 votes

No, there is plenty wrong with rallying hate against a person, regardless of whether or not they actually broke the rules. Riot is strictly against naming & shaming and witch-hunting. You should read the Boards Universal Rules, particularly this bit which I'll c/p into this comment:

This is not the place for:

Naming and Shaming

If you see or hear about another person breaking the rules, in-game or on Boards, regardless of evidence, please send a ticket in to us at https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new Moderators will look for the following:

  • Personal attacks
  • Posts that accuse others of causing a negative in-game experience
  • Posts targeted at witch-hunting / naming and shaming
  • Posts accusing others of malicious activity
  • Posts that accuse others of cheating or using illegal services
  • Posts accusing others of trolling on the Boards

Your proof doesn't mean anything when the rules specifically state you're not allowed to do it. If you have "proof" of someone breaking the rules, you bring it up with Riot Support, not try to spark people's hate for the player on the boards.

gabetheguy1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=scdJ3dzB,comment-id=000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2018-01-21T14:58:10.520+0000)

No, there is plenty wrong with rallying hate against a person, regardless of whether or not they actually broke the rules. Riot is strictly against naming & shaming and witch-hunting. You should read the Boards Universal Rules, particularly this bit which I'll c/p into this comment:

Your proof doesn't mean anything when the rules specifically state you're not allowed to do it. If you have "proof" of someone breaking the rules, you bring it up with Riot Support, not try to spark people's hate for the player on the boards.

I'm well aware of riot's garbage rules. I simply disagree with them.

o brigid o1 votes

You sound like a really sad person.

I feel sorry for you.

I hope you're able to find an outlet for all that anger you obviously hold on to.

redniwediS1 votes

Technically, since there are no witches, the proper term is scapegoating.

Witch-hunting as a modern term is about finding someone who potentially did something wrong and punishing them without due process. The truth matters very little to it, and public perception isn't the most reliable thing in the world. It's not about finding a scapegoat for your problems like it originally was.

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

Technically, since there are no witches, the proper term is scapegoating.

Witch-hunting as a modern term is about finding someone who potentially did something wrong and punishing them without due process. The truth matters very little to it, and public perception isn't the most reliable thing in the world. It's not about finding a scapegoat for your problems like it originally was.

"omg people need to stop witch hunting hitler"

is this really how some people think?

redniwediS1 votes

Which part, what I said or about hitler? War is more than a little different than a witch hunt, so that's not the greatest example there.

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

Which part, what I said or about hitler? War is more than a little different than a witch hunt, so that's not the greatest example there.

I'm referring to general hatred against hitler/nazism. "Oh my god rallying hate against something horrible is so bad" no it's not. things like that need to be purged.

redniwediS1 votes

Ah, bit of a jump from what I was talking about, but I see how it fits. I'd rather not let hate be a part of things, as I'd rather let the cold machine of due process take it's course, but people who think you have to fight hate with it's polar opposite and avoid it at all costs really bother me.

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

Ah, bit of a jump from what I was talking about, but I see how it fits. I'd rather not let hate be a part of things, as I'd rather let the cold machine of due process take it's course, but people who think you have to fight hate with it's polar opposite and avoid it at all costs really bother me.

-person is shamed and hated by community

-person regularly humiliated

-person leaves community

-riot loses profits, but the community is a bit better.

This is the only reason riot cares about "witch hunting" tbh.

redniwediS2 votes

See, your example there would be workable if one thing is assumed before hand; the person who left was a detriment to the community.

There are people who want to shame others for simply being bad at the game. When I started back in season 1 I was bad enough that I would regularly lose lane to bots. I didn't understand what most of the items did, or what most of the champions did, and didn't have a great grasp on the controls.

I've come a long way since then, but if people had shamed me for not being naturally skilled at League I probably wouldn't have kept playing. I'm not a troll or a flamer, so I don't really see how the community would have been "a bit better" if I had been forced away from learning the game.

The reason Riot cares about witch hunting isn't because of profit, it's because it can't be directed only at people with problematic behavior if it is allowed. If it could be I'll admit they might be willing to let it happen.

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

See, your example there would be workable if one thing is assumed before hand; the person who left was a detriment to the community.

There are people who want to shame others for simply being bad at the game. When I started back in season 1 I was bad enough that I would regularly lose lane to bots. I didn't understand what most of the items did, or what most of the champions did, and didn't have a great grasp on the controls.

I've come a long way since then, but if people had shamed me for not being naturally skilled at League I probably wouldn't have kept playing. I'm not a troll or a flamer, so I don't really see how the community would have been "a bit better" if I had been forced away from learning the game.

The reason Riot cares about witch hunting isn't because of profit, it's because it can't be directed only at people with problematic behavior if it is allowed. If it could be I'll admit they might be willing to let it happen.

like I said, proof. chat logs and footage of them standing there emoting in a turret are more than enough proof.

redniwediS1 votes

Wrong person on the proof thing. You were talking to Umbral Regent about proof, not me.

You and I are pretty much on the same page.

AraMoOse1 votes

{quoted}

It's not witch hunting if they're actually a witch. so many people don't understand the proper use of the term.

Yes but how can you tell if they're a witch if you don't have a duck to weigh them against?

gabetheguy1 votes

{quoted}

Yes but how can you tell if they're a witch if you don't have a duck to weigh them against?

just test if they float, witches are made of wood after all.

redniwediS2 votes

Personally I'd rather they just disable that notification for good and tell us all it won't be happening anymore. Some of the vocal people around here will say "look at them covering things up", but at the end of the day it would be for the best.

zPOOPz2 votes

I agree. Better for the IFS to either completely send everyone every single punished report (no names obviously) or don't send any report at all. This seemingly "random" buggy or "send only to the last person who sent the report" feedback report make no logical sense at all.

koshkyra1 votes

He just played a game and its over 24 hours later

redniwediS1 votes

https://i.imgur.com/ACZhFYu.png

Here's a flowchart of how the punishment system works. If this was his first or second punishment he would still be able to play. If this is his first instance of toxic behavior then the case against him is still being built, and being impatient and vindictive won't speed things up.

Sona Ping2 votes

Up to 8 other players could get that pop up instead if it is even sent, so why would you pin any expectations onto that scenario.

Ab0ut30Ninjas1 votes

"system isn't unreliable" lol

More from Player Behavior

More by koshkyra