It is too often that you run into feeders, trolls, or people who are just straight horrid in all chat, further aggravated when these people are better at finding each other than a dog finding it's tail.
ThatH1N14 votesThe system only punishes people who say toxic things, feeding and trolling are 100% okay as riot does nothing about it.
Kei1432 votesoh they ban them alright.
Its a little harder to catch the good trollers, but they still get punished.
BudgetMessiah3 votesNo they don't. I've done it on smurf accounts. The system is completely ineffective in this regard. It only punishes naughty words, and is therefore useless.
ThatH1N12 votesNo they don't. I've done it on smurf accounts. The system is completely ineffective in this regard. It only punishes naughty words, and is therefore useless.
Yeah I have an EUNE account that I have been testing this on. I have yet to even be notified of a report. As long as you start the game and /mute all, nothing will happen to you. Riot only punishes speech not actions. I guess that is what you get with and internet culture that looks to be offended recreationally.
No they don't. I've done it on smurf accounts. The system is completely ineffective in this regard. It only punishes naughty words, and is therefore useless. {quoted}
Yeah I have an EUNE account that I have been testing this on. I have yet to even be notified of a report. As long as you start the game and /mute all, nothing will happen to you. Riot only punishes speech not actions. I guess that is what you get with and internet culture that looks to be offended recreationally.
Where's your proof? Riot does punish feeders and trolls. Just because the systems don't do it as fast as you would like doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. Verbal abuse is punished more because it's easier to catch and because the systems are designed not to punish people who have a few bad games.
Sarutobi2 votesI mean its really hard to implicate a system that is competent. Because it would need to look into the game and see if said person is feeding, or trolling, or being horrid in chat. Granted the chat thing is already implemented and its easy to detect, hence why we already it in place. As for feeding and trolling those are really hard to find especially if the person doesnt outright claim they are, which most people wont do! Plus you cant just rely on peoples reports. People will report for just about any reason. Ive seen people report just for using a certain champion despite them playing well during the game and possibly even winning the game, but still ended up reporting the player just because they didnt like the champion they were using. Feeding is somewhat obvious, but again people report for any reason. Ive seen people report others for giving up First Blood. if we took those reports as legit then i would assume every single one of us would have been ban at one point, which is wrong! This is one reason why can leave comments/detail when we report people. Because it helps when we report and someone has to look into the report know what exactly we are reporting these people. it gives help in understanding what the community feels as people report. Im sure they throw out things like Oh this person gave up first blood he was feeding.
AramsAreBest1 votesI would say intentional feeding/ throwing is the least obvious.
Sarutobi1 votesI would say intentional feeding/ throwing is the least obvious.
Ya but how can you show it? Would you consider 10 deaths as feeding? it all depends on when and where those 10 deaths were. if you go into lane and die, while coming back only to die again, yes that would be feeding. But if you are in a teamfight and die, try to steal Dragon/Rift/Baron but ended up dying to the point where you are up to 10 deaths, how could you consider that feeding? Now i dont know how Riot's Report team actually looks into games that someone was reported in, but you cannot base it off of just someones death count. Or else by that logic Support's would probably be considered feeders!
AramsAreBest1 votesThat's why I said least obvious
KVbqbFsC8e1 votesThere would be less than there is now.
