got a 14 day ban on a smurf on euw today.

dominusx·Oct 12, 2016·4 votes·640 views

Took ya long i'll be honest your system is trash should've been banned like 3weeks ago :p

9 Comments

SarutobiOct 12, 20163 votes

Well the system is suppose to be easy as it knows people have bad games. I'm going to assume you want a stricter system which would be too harsh especially for light offenders!

dominusxOct 12, 20163 votes

it should be strict when it comes to INT feeding like i did a few weeks back but noooo 7games in a row INT'ing didnt even get a chatban. i got them all together last week ahah

Deep Terror NamiOct 12, 20162 votes

Intentional feeding will never result in a chat restriction. Chat restrictions are reserved exclusively for chat offenses, while gameplay offenses skip to a 14 day or permanent ban.

Chat offenses are pretty easy to check for, but it's extremely difficult to determine the intent of a player for gameplay offenses; it's easy to misidentify a player having some bad games or is just bad overall from an intentional feeder sometimes. Yes, the system could definitely do with some improvements, but it'll never be as good as it should be. Even manual reviews can have a difficult or impossible time trying to determine a player's intentions.

If a player is getting away with obvious intentional feeding, it could just be that the players aren't accurately and consistently reporting it. If nobody reports an offense it can't be punished, and players that tend to make false reports will have a harder time triggering the review for that as well.

dominusxOct 12, 20161 votes

well i dunno then people spammed report rengar for picking rengar support or kha zix for not grouping etc etc. since i dont do the int feed of run it down mid i just dont group or help anyone when i'm pissed so yeh i was tryna test the limits 1 weeks of INT'ing didnt ban me only chat thrashtalk did it's a shame

scazzmanOct 12, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Deep Terror Nami,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=RLHzBh4Z,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2016-10-12T11:42:35.270+0000)

Intentional feeding will never result in a chat restriction. Chat restrictions are reserved exclusively for chat offenses, while gameplay offenses skip to a 14 day or permanent ban.

Chat offenses are pretty easy to check for, but it's extremely difficult to determine the intent of a player for gameplay offenses; it's easy to misidentify a player having some bad games or is just bad overall from an intentional feeder sometimes. Yes, the system could definitely do with some improvements, but it'll never be as good as it should be. Even manual reviews can have a difficult or impossible time trying to determine a player's intentions.

If a player is getting away with obvious intentional feeding, it could just be that the players aren't accurately and consistently reporting it. If nobody reports an offense it can't be punished, and players that tend to make false reports will have a harder time triggering the review for that as well.

this is why they need to get rid of hidden report weight. it serves no point under an automated system other then make it harder for trolls to get banned

S0kaXOct 12, 20162 votes

Um, that is not a whiny post about being banned, this should get upvotes

dominusxOct 12, 20163 votes

yah man i know when i'm in the wrong haha imma be honest i did wanna get banned ever since my winrate got dumbstered aka fell below 60% i kinda didnt give a fuck outside having blossom kha on the account x)

HorusEyeOct 12, 20161 votes

No chat logs. Therefore, you were toxic in a lot of games. System working as intended.

dominusxOct 12, 20163 votes

that's what i mean i should have been banned way earlier cause i was actually way more toxic like 3 weeks ago. and i INT feeded but wasnt getting banned or anything . I did get banned today cause i vented off a little bit just sayin system is stupid should act faster