strike system reform.

scazzman·8/31/2016, 3:25:51 AM·1 votes·304 views

i actually agree with the idea for the most part however. i feel like all 3 prior punishments are disproportionately lax compared to the permaban step. and that certain offenses arent punished severely enough, such as intentional feeding the current system is

10 game chat ban 25 game chat ban 14 day ban permaban

my proposed new system

verbal warning 14 day ban 1 year ban permaban

players still get the same number of strikes however they get just a warning for a first offense. and punishments become harsher to compensate. this would also reduce the number of toxic players able to play by eliminating chat restrictions

10 Comments

Awkward Couch8/31/2016, 3:53:56 AM2 votes

Going from a verbal warning to a 14 day ban is really extreme. I think most player who would get a 1 year ban, just wouldn't come back to the game I'm not sure how I feel about that.

SexualizeOatmeal8/31/2016, 10:15:08 AM1 votes

Its such a huge jump from punishments... You say that they arent hard enough, but with what you have, the 1 year ban might as well be a perma ban, cause there isnt a reason to wait an entire year to play the game again. The current system is fine as it is if you ask me...

EvilDustMan8/31/2016, 10:28:21 AM1 votes

Nah. If you get to a 14 day ban, you probably aren't willing to reform. 10 and 25 are basically warnings. Feeding starts at 14 days, so it puts you one step away from a permaban.

MissingKayo8/31/2016, 10:58:03 PM1 votes

or no.