do cuter skins cause less aggro in teamfights
subconsciously do cute skins (pug maw) have less human aggro as opposed to badazz skins like omega squad teemo or is it a just a skin and nothing more that effects judgment on enemy and/or ally behavior.
subconsciously do cute skins (pug maw) have less human aggro as opposed to badazz skins like omega squad teemo or is it a just a skin and nothing more that effects judgment on enemy and/or ally behavior.
teemo would get global taunt regardless of what skin he uses
I mean I don't show any preference to skins beyond telling the player when the game first starts that they have a cool one or something like that. Though I do admit... if it's a teemo, I will totally flash into the entire enemy team 1v5 to kill that rat. It's this compulsion. Must. Kill. The. Teemo.
[sona-playing]
You are not alone.
Those shrooms are evil.
Seems like the cute skins draw more aggro.
i mean...
is like as pacifist as you can get in league. so candy king ivern is like....... ur not even in a teamfight... pretty much a carebear cameo that's how non-aggro it gets
Depends on the person, graphic settings, and of course how fed they are.
Some people might question you for why you would have a teemo skin
No
mind explaining instead of a plain no maybe theres a hidden psychology in skins
mind explaining instead of a plain no maybe theres a hidden psychology in skins
Well, for me atleast. I've been playing this game for about 3-4 years now and I don't think a skin affects my perception on how intimidating a champion is at all because I usually know how much damage that champion can deal and how weak they are. I guess it's based on how experienced you are at the game but I think past a certain point it doesn't matter since you have a lot of game knowledge
The pug,maw skin makes me want to get kog first, i just really hate that skin
mind explaining instead of a plain no maybe theres a hidden psychology in skins
Interesting concept and I agree, if I see someone with a cute skin I don't expect that player to be toxic and I'll usually favor them over other players in the sense that I'm quicker to help those players out before I help others.
you mean like omega teemo is probs more "tryhard and i can do things myself" skin who will flame you if you fail vs a pug maw skin who say "at least you tried to help me"? those are appropriate examples as they are the my best yin/yang concepts
you mean like omega teemo is probs more "tryhard and i can do things myself" skin who will flame you if you fail vs a pug maw skin who say "at least you tried to help me"? those are appropriate examples as they are the my best yin/yang concepts
Precisely, and a feeding pug'maw would have a lower chance of flaming jg as opposed to a feeding OSTeemo in my subconscious thought process.
I feel like Ahri naturally lores people into chasing after her and actually end up dieing.
So champ like Ahri is probably focused so much more than most other champ i think.
-Come in to upvote comment-
![]()
so sad... must be level 30 to comment
-TRIGGERED-
It's an interesting question. I would guess probably. In games that feature a red team and blue team (i.e. Halo), with all other things being equal, the red team wins slightly more often.
By the same logic, a less aggressively-minded skin design would lead to less aggressive play. Of course, the magnitude of the impact is probably tiny.
I am not conscious of the skins used by players in team fights. I am merely aware of the champions and what each one can and cannot do for or to me.
I'm personally a fan of cute skins, but I don't think I have a specific preference to them with regard to other players.
That being said, I occasionally try my best to be OBNOXIOUSLY ADORABLE to keep my team happy and playing well. [sg-kiko]
Maybe it's twofold?
Same [sg-miss-fortune] Tho cosplaying as a cute skin makes things even more ecstatic!
Probably for tilted players, if any. Usually it's your role/damage/score that determine if you're focused or not.