the automated system actually works pretty well for dealing with "negative chat" tribunal 2.0 once it's up and running, would have 2 types of cases. the first would be used to combat in game trolling, and offer replay footage, and would show what type of trolling the player was accused of. the second would be to to determine if a punished player was being provoked, that way people trying to get a rise out of people can be eliminated more quickly
TrulyBland1 votesI have yet to see a case of somebody intentionally provoking somebody into toxic chat, that isn't already considered a punishable offense in itself. But ultimately the main idea of Tribunal always was to make the system more transparent, so showing Tribunal users that these people get punished is actually an excellent idea.
scazzman1 votesyou probably have seen it. but the people who flamebait tend to target a single player on the team, usually someone who they think they can get a reaction out of. and troll in a way where it's only obvious to the person being trolled, such as stealing farm, baiting tanks into engaging and then letting them die, feeding, but only 3 or 4 kills early game to a single lane. and then pretending to "try" after the game is thrown into an unwinnable state
EvilDustMan1 votesOkay. So everyone who votes in the tribunal is going to watch the entire 30 minute game. The 30 minute game that had to be recorded just in case. Out of millions of games.
Feeder buster is going to be better at it, sorry.