Let's just make it so surrender votes that are 3-2 end the game
It clearly shows in the OFA "lottery pick" that 3 against 2 is the supreme and fair ruling... Logic/10 ...
It clearly shows in the OFA "lottery pick" that 3 against 2 is the supreme and fair ruling... Logic/10 ...
another "fun" player complaining about rotational games, imagine that.
Lol was a joke thread more than anything, going at the fact that they are 2 very similar things yet ruled so differently . :P
your right, how players give up a game is totally like how a rational game mode pick champs. You have shown everybody the light, how could of everyone been so foolish. Rotational /temp systems should apply to the standard/ real game mode. Makes prefect sense. /S
why so salty its a full joke xD
No. If you think about it. It's 40% of players that don't want to surrender a specific game.
Lol was a joke thread more than anything, going at the fact that they are 2 very similar things yet ruled so differently . :P
I mean in my opinion it should be majority rules. It sucks when you know a game is at a lost and yet because you have a Duo they are basically the "rulers" of if the game stays active or not.
Lol was a joke thread more than anything, going at the fact that they are 2 very similar things yet ruled so differently . :P
Or make it that it needs to be a 5/0 vote in rankeds. Would be even better than the 4/1.
Lol was a joke thread more than anything, going at the fact that they are 2 very similar things yet ruled so differently . :P