If you have the highest playerbase average games played, you should have a decent winrate. I mean, Fiddles been nerfed to shit plus meta changes. We all remember how annoying as fuck Akali was, but you went too far with her as well. You do realize that you can nerf a champ without completely gutting them, right? It is possible. I've seen it. You don't have to nerf a champ 10x if they are too strong.
Left Hook Larry2 votesHe has a 50% win rate? He's perfectly fine. Akali is fine as well, maybe a few tweaks, but she's fine
LaceUp231 votesSo you think a champion that's players average over 300 ranked games should have a lower win rate than a champion that's players average 50? I'm struggling to see how that makes sense.
Left Hook Larry1 votes50% win rate is perfectly fine. The reason his win rate isn't amazing is because he doesn't fit into the meta well
LaceUp231 votesBump. Would love a rito comment.
Tryndubmere1 votesAkali is fine, i play her all the time and her dmg is there which is all she needs. Although e not activating q does get me killed sometimes. =(
LaceUp231 votesAkali sucks now lol. I love when the enemy team has one. She has that low of a winrate, despite having the highest playerbase average games played. That doesn't sit well with me.
Bemapon1 votesI agree that they went a little too far with Akali. Key words, "A little".
My only real problem with her is no matter how good I do, I cannot win the game. I really find her enjoyable to play, its just too hard to actually win with her.