Unfair ruling in EU LCS.
If you watch the LCS like many of us, in the game between Roccat and SK, I'm sure you saw Roccat get stomped. But should that really have happened? If you noticed in the champ select, SK gaming player was hitting "random" champ button a lot to kinda troll, and ended up ACCIDENTALLY locking in the wrong champion because he ran out of time. Now the kicker? THEY RESET IT! They re-did the champ select upto that point, and then let them re-pick the incorrect champion. That champion that they accidentally selected was Kalista, and when they fixed it, they instead picked Lucian. In which he went 5/0/7. Personally I think that in that level of play, if they run out of time and lock the wrong champion, they should have had to play it. You don't get that kind of treatment in normal ranked. They made a mistake that was completely their fault, and they got a rest. Anybody else think that is unfair?