Why Ranked Sucks

StoryDuck·8/16/2015, 10:02:00 PM·2 votes·705 views

I don't know what it is about ranked games but I lose a lot of them. However, I run teambuilder and I win a lot. Furthermore, I tend to be pitted with diamond and plat allies in team builder (I assume as they have the boarders) so i assume I'm playing opponents of similar calibur but I am stuck in Gold 4/5 in ranked. Both games will often see my KDA being very high but i will lose more games in ranked after winning lane then in teambuilder which when i win my lane tend to win.

2 Comments

ikKN1t518F8/16/2015, 11:51:28 PM1 votes

In ranked you play against everyone that is equal to your elo, in teambuilder you don't.

AdderTude9/13/2015, 7:18:52 PM1 votes

{quoted}

I don't know what it is about ranked games but I lose a lot of them. However, I run teambuilder and I win a lot. Furthermore, I tend to be pitted with diamond and plat allies in team builder (I assume as they have the boarders) so i assume I'm playing opponents of similar calibur but I am stuck in Gold 4/5 in ranked. Both games will often see my KDA being very high but i will lose more games in ranked after winning lane then in teambuilder which when i win my lane tend to win.

In my experience, I tend to see that more people use the cheapest champions to steamroll people with. I personally keep clear of those broken champions because winning with them felt way too easy (Mordekaiser, for example, as melee AP carry at bot; we won the lane and match so easily, I swore off using him until the nerf comes through in 5.18). However, most people would rather play the broken champions to death. Ranked sucks because of it. I keep saying the Game needs more bans but they specifically said they aren't interested in adding more. This was on a Reddit thread.