DuoQ shouldn't exist in a ranked environment

XinZhao2WinNhao··3 votes·370 views

While many people play duo q seriously with no intend to be carried, there are people who definitely use it to beat the rating system, per se, which is super easy to do with the current duoQ. People can duo with their friends' smurfs and get carried to diamond easy. Many games have these ways they can "trick the system" without really breaking the rules. For example, let's talk about turn-based strategy games. Many of those games allow players to choose how much time they are allowed to take in a turn. Some people who play these games online purposely pick opponents they know have lag from observing plenty of their games, and then pick an unreasonable amount of time (for example 3 seconds per card in a card game). And they would try to wait for their opponent to lag so they would win the game. So now, many of those games make a limit for 1 minute per card/move or whatever as the fastest time limit possible. Many of the people who play faster games do not try to do that to beat the system on purpose, but some of them do. I consider duoQ carrying to be similar to this- you're not explicitly breaking the rules but you're sorta cheating because you don't deserve the rating you get.

DuoQ shouldn't exist in a ranked game environment imo. Ranked should be about how good you are when the situation depends on you, not how good you are while playing with a friend.

7 Comments

The Poetic Zed2 votes

by this logic ranked in itself is flawed. your whole rank depends on the teams you're placed with. duoq or solo, it's always going to depend on things and people other than yourself

XinZhao2WinNhao1 votes

{quoted}

by this logic ranked in itself is flawed. your whole rank depends on the teams you're placed with. duoq or solo, it's always going to depend on things and people other than yourself

No, because soloQ is random so your chances, by the law of large numbers, should even out to about your own skill level whereas duoQ is different because you are always with another player.

The Poetic Zed1 votes

by the law of large numbers, any team based game is not going to create an accurate rank for solo players

XinZhao2WinNhao1 votes

{quoted}

by the law of large numbers, any team based game is not going to create an accurate rank for solo players

DuoQ carrying is currently not against the rules, but I absolutely have negative respect for people who get carried by a duoQ.

Just like the card game people I mention in my OP didn't break any rules, but they are horrible players and are disrespectful to people who work fucking hard to become a great fucking player.

The Poetic Zed1 votes

negative respect? easier to say no respect. i never said duoq was fair or unfair. i didn't present an opinion on it. why are you bringing it up in a debate on the accuracy of ranking in solo

XinZhao2WinNhao1 votes

{quoted}

negative respect? easier to say no respect. i never said duoq was fair or unfair. i didn't present an opinion on it. why are you bringing it up in a debate on the accuracy of ranking in solo

negative respect is even worse than no respect

no respect is like you don't respect them but you don't really disrespect them.

negative respect is when you think that someone absolutely has a lack of integrity

The Poetic Zed1 votes

yeah...no

More from [ARCHIVED] Miscellaneous

More by XinZhao2WinNhao