I've never found cartoons attractive
But bros, that blood moon Diana picture is wut.
Look at this. Smack my ass and call me a weeaboo.
Edit: Yes, I called it a cartoon to trigger you guys that let silly things trigger you.
But bros, that blood moon Diana picture is wut.
Look at this. Smack my ass and call me a weeaboo.
Edit: Yes, I called it a cartoon to trigger you guys that let silly things trigger you.
Diana is bae. ever since release.
It's not a cartoon, it's a portrait, a cartoon, by definition, is a simple drawing of a person with exagerated features, that's a portrait, this is a cartoon: https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/happy-smiling-man-blue-clothes-pants-standing-showing-two-finger-hand-sign-29770125.jpg Main difference being that cartoons are used for humor, while portraits are more to show off artistic skill, and look pretty, like skins. Also, weeaboo is someone who wants to be Japanese, not sure you knew that.
[deleted]
Difference between cartoon and absolutely beautiful almost perfectly realistic art. See almost anything made by Square Enix lately for proof. (Kingsglaive anyone?)
downvoted for calling a piece of art a cartoon. there is nothing cartoonish about it. its closer to realistic then even anime
this is like calling all work don't by artists cartoons. this looks more realistic then half the portrait paintings done in the world , that are based on real people
Why would you have a problem to find or admit a cartoon is sexy, attractive or arousing though? I mean why would there be any shameful difference of doing so? If something looks good then it looks good, why pretend it doesn't for a particularly arbitrary reason? Genuine curiosity :o
Okey doke, weeb smacks ass
2D >3D
ITT: IZ NAUT A CARTON IZ ANIME U HEEETHEN
Gross..
Jaw-dropping beauty, tbh.
its back desktop background XD
More of a E. Lux guy myself, but I can see the appeal in BM Diana.