Laning against Nasus is like babysiting a 4 year old

Why do I even bother with either of you

im offensive, and this comment is 4 years old to me

Usually, neither does the Nasus. How we still don't have a Farmer Nasus skin, I will never know.

{quoted}

ya and it starts to smell

XD nice

i've seen that happen....SO many times.

Yes Nasus really isn't that strong late game That's because Nasus is a mid game champion... not a late game champion (unless he is against a team which for some reason can't kite him.. then yes he is a late game champion) The reason he falls off late game is because the carries damage increase faster then his defense so he dies faster and well doesn't matter how much Q damage you have if you aren't able to use it And almost all Carries have some sort of either CC or mobility to deal with Nasus not to mention the support and all the other people protecting the carry

Though of course Nasus can be pretty good at dealing with Tanks and bruisers who dive into his team as he has decent damage to deal with them and he doesn't really need to be afraid of their CC/damage And of course it also helps if Nasus has a tank or something on his team who can initiate and lock down targets as this would help with his problem of getting kited

Why would you pick Morgana if you want to sit top all day long? Like... yeah she pushes waves pretty fast... but she isn't the best at pushing towers and really she is best with the team supporting her allies with all of her utility

Something like Tryndamere would be a lot better... better at pushing towers still decent at pushing the wave and much better at fighting 1v1 (though of course tanks with Thornmail are hard to deal with)

{quoted}

Something is wrong with clicking on links today. This is what I see

Also, I should note I am not as well read in the lore as ShadowStorm is. I have not read all the JoJ yet - I read it on a per-champion basis when I want to know more about that particular champion. Especially if there's a lore thread about that champ, and I want to be able to follow along. So he's more in the know than I am on any particular element.

Of course, until we manage to release something that starts to prove that we can move beyond chapter 1, our ledger will continue to drip with red ink. I hope we can start turning that around asap.

ShadowStorm describes this as releasing chapter 1 - and that's a very good way of describing it. I would rather we had lots of stories in different stages - a few that have finished book 1, a few half way through book 2, and a few that are only up to chapter 1, 6, or even 15.

My personal opinion is that we've been creating our cold-opens - the bit of a TV show before the opening credits kick in. We've shown our main character, we get a glimpse of their world, we get a few character-establishing lines and then we leave it hanging. The rest of the episode hasn't turned up yet. Maybe if we take the long view, it'll all be great - we'll get the whole episode and more episodes besides! But (as Ekko proves) timeliness does matter.

I don't want to expose a champion and leave no room for future mysteries and stories - of course not - but I could read a Batman comic arc and feel that I had a full story, without precluding the opportunity for future Batman stories. I could watch an episode of Doctor Who and feel that we had a conclusion - even if I will not be surprised to see the Daleks again, or discover that clues from that episode tie into the series finale.

Maybe our plan is more of the slow establishing glimpses - but I think there's a lot of red on our ledger in terms of lore goodwill and that getting a fully formed story out in really short order would help more than most other actions would. Maybe that messes up a long term plan - my (headstrong) attitude would be to damn the consequences and do something now*. (Or as quickly as humanly possible.)

The rest of this is less about my disagreement with one or two of ShadowStorm's opinions, and more an elaboration on my position. I agree with him on other bits though! We're not going to come to blows, I hope!

Ok, so my disagreements with ShadowStorm's opinions (Woo! Opinion 'fight'!) I went through the thread identifying bits and pieces to quote, but I think my overarching difference of opinion is that I think we need, at Riot, to do some proving of our intentions. I believe that it would be very helpful if we were to take a contained story involving a champion (or more than two, ideally), in a rich, consistent, setting, and give it a beginning, middle and end.

Hey, Chromatic Eagle.

undefined I appreciate you doing this, and I hate to be that guy, but what do you disagree with ShadowStorm about? I'm not trying to start a cage match here, but for a while now many of us have felt that Riot has taken a solidarity stance regarding the retcon. Even if they acknowledge the handling of it is bad, it seems like the company stands by with its decision.

Leave either of them alone for 5 seconds and some really bad crap happens

LOL

Too long; Didn't read.

Nice

{quoted}

Playing this game is like babysitting 4 year olds. Gotta tell everyone what to do and what not to do, else they go complete derp.

If only it was that easy.