I feel like we are being insulted.
"I've had good games with him" is an awful bit of handwaving. I've had good games as insert weaker champ here, but that sure doesn't mean insert weaker champ here is strong/in a good place/etc. Hell, I've had bad games as Nasus top and pre-rework Kass... does that mean they were balanced (or even weak)?
And yet, here were are... it seems like every 3rd red post about Skarner contains "I've had good games with him".
How is his win rate? Relative to prework? His pick rate? Also relative to prework?
Those don't tell the whole picture, no doubt... but they are infinitely better than "I've had good games".
I can actually deal with the lack of a permaslow. Hell, I will get IBG at some point and get my permaslow back (which that + Mundo says permaslow isn't as toxic as we are let on to believe). I'm just taken aback that a champ picked about 1% of the time is nerfed for features still in the game (permaslow) while champions like the ticking time bomb that is Nasus (don't end the game fast enough... Nasus does it for you), Lucian (who virtually obsoletes every other ADC in the game), and others continue to dominate ranked (for a game with over 100 champions, I'm seeing the same 20 get recycled with frightening regularity).
And to top it all off, any identity that Skarner had (that thing that made the dozens of us, dozens!, pick him) was removed in the process.
Also, quick question, why in all that is holy was his shield move speed given a ramp up? You removed permaslow from Q, you made E a skillshot with a fairly long cooldown, and then you guys decided to add a move speed ramp up on a pop-able steroid?!?