AFK surrender votes

Bardmageddon·1/8/2019, 1:58:55 PM·4 votes·2,652 views

In order to surrender, 75-80% of all players currently in the game needs to agree to surrender. The concept makes sense but there is a huge flaw in it. If a person doesn't vote, it will be treated as a "no" instead of simply changing the total amount of players present. Being stuck in game for an extra 10-15 min just because the ragequiter minimized the client instead of exiting is just dumb.

A simple fix is to change the surrender system to conclude the result on all players who actually voted.

8 Comments

Birdfcker1/8/2019, 2:00:02 PM3 votes

that would make too much sense

Dr Dog1/8/2019, 6:02:15 PM2 votes

honestly, im sick of having some jerkoffs not voting at all then getting counted as a no, if you dont use your vote you should forfeit your right to impact the ff vote at all or just give an automatic yes to the vote if you dont care enough to vote on it, you dont care enough about the match to stay in it

dragfin121/8/2019, 3:55:30 PM1 votes

{quoted}

In order to surrender, 75-80% of all players currently in the game needs to agree to surrender. The concept makes sense but there is a huge flaw in it. If a person doesn't vote, it will be treated as a "no" instead of simply changing the total amount of players present. Being stuck in game for an extra 10-15 min just because the ragequiter minimized the client instead of exiting is just dumb.

A simple fix is to change the surrender system to conclude the result on all players who actually voted.

The fix is to get better at the game so you don't need to surrender in the first place. That goes for anyone who pushes the, "I suck so please let me go ruin another game faster instead of staying and actually learning how to play the game button".

All that button is good for is abuse by low elo players who never learn anything because they quit.

It needs to be taken out of the game except for high elo ranked players who actually use it for it's intended purpose and don't abuse it.